ArticleJAMA psychiatry2024
Population-Based Risk of Psychiatric Disorders Associated With Recurrent Copy Number Variants.
Article in JAMA psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia in East Asian populations.Nature genetics · 2026Pooled it
- Higher frequencies of CNV deletions in bipolar disorder among Chinese Population.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Recurrent Copy Number Variants and Psychiatric Outcomes in the Context of Polygenic Scores.JAMA psychiatry · 2026Article
- Copy number variants reveal divergent genetic and diagnostic cortical signatures across psychiatric disorders.Research square · 2026Article
- The role of rare copy number variants in early-onset depression.JCPP advances · 2026Article
- Genetic insights on the mechanisms of human cortical folding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CNValidatron: accurate and efficient validation of PennCNV calls using computer vision.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Dimensional phenotype measurement in children with rare genetic conditions: new insights into the aetiology of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Genetics to Improve Outcomes in Schizophrenia (GENios): A within-case molecular genetic study protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- 17q12 Recurrent Deletion Syndrome in Childhood.Genes · 2025Review
- CNValidatron: Accurate And Efficient Validation of PennCNV Calls Using Computer Vision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Novel tools for comparing the architecture of psychopathology between neurogenetic disorders: An application to X- versus Y-chromosome aneuploidy effects in males.Psychological medicine · 2025Article
- Molecular Screening Reveals De Novo Loss-of-FunctionInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Cortical differences across psychiatric disorders and associated common and rare genetic variants.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Novel tools for comparing the architecture of psychopathology between neurogenetic disorders: An application to X- vs. Y-chromosome aneuploidy effects in males.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Neurological Insights into 16p11.2- And 22q11.2-Related Disorders: A Mini-Review.Current genomics · 2025Review
- Analysis of exonic deletions in a large population study provides novel insights into NRXN1 pathology.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- The pleiotropic spectrum of proximal 16p11.2 CNVs.American journal of human genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Recurrent copy number variants (rCNVs) have been associated with increased risk of psychiatric disorders in case-control studies, but their population-level impact is unknown. Objective: To provide unbiased population-based estimates of prevalence and risk associated with psychiatric disorders for rCNVs and to compare risks across outcomes, rCNV dosage type (deletions or duplications), and locus features. Design, Setting, and Participants: This genetic association study is an analysis of data from the Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research (iPSYCH) case-cohort sample of individuals born in Denmark in 1981-2008 and followed up until 2015, including (1) all individuals (n = 92 531) with a hospital discharge diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD), or schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) and (2) a subcohort (n = 50 625) randomly drawn from the source population. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to August 2023. Exposures: Carrier status of deletions and duplications at 27 autosomal rCNV loci was determined from neonatal blood samples genotyped on single-nucleotide variant microarrays. Main Outcomes and Measures: Population-based rCNV prevalence was estimated with a survey model using finite population correction to account for oversampling of cases. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates and 95% CIs for psychiatric disorders were derived using weighted Cox proportional hazard models. Risks were compared across outcomes, dosage type, and locus features using generalized estimating equation models. Results: A total of 3547 rCNVs were identified in 64 735 individuals assigned male at birth (53.8%) and 55 512 individuals assigned female at birth (46.2%) whose age at the end of follow-up ranged from 7.0 to 34.7 years (mean, 21.8 years). Most observed increases in rCNV-associated risk for ADHD, ASD, or SSD were moderate, and risk estimates were highly correlated across these disorders. Notable exceptions included high ASD-associated risk observed for Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome duplications (HR, 20.8; 95% CI, 7.9-55). No rCNV was associated with increased MDD risk. Also, rCNV-associated risk was positively correlated with locus size and gene constraint but not with dosage type. Comparison with published case-control and community-based studies revealed a higher prevalence of deletions and lower associated increase in risk for several rCNVs in iPSYCH2015. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that several rCNVs were more prevalent and conferred less risk of psychiatric disorders than estimated previously. Most case-control studies overestimate rCNV-associated risk of psychiatric disorders, likely because of selection bias. In an era where genetics is increasingly being clinically applied, these results highlight the importance of population-based risk estimates for genetics-based predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.