Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922628›Full record

Trial reportTranslational vision science & technology2024

Effect of Individualized Ocular Refraction Customization Spectacle Lens Wear on Visual Performance in Myopic Chinese Children.

Ye Wu, Ji Kou, Si Lei, Ling Xiong, Qian Chen, Meixia Zhang, Longqian Liu

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Myopia control efficacy of individualised ocular refraction customisation spectacle lenses: A 2-year follow-up study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  2. Spectacle lenses for control of myopia progression in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ye WuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Ji KouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Si LeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Ling XiongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Qian ChenCenter of Biostatistics, Design, Measurement and Evaluation, Department of Clinical Research Management, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.
Meixia ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Research Laboratory of Macular Disease, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Longqian LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Laboratory of Optometry and Vision Sciences, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Individualized ocular refraction customization (IORC) lenses can be individually adjusted depending on the initial relative peripheral refraction to determine the myopic defocus (MD). We aimed to compare visual performance of children wearing IORC lenses with different amounts of MD to determine whether higher MD resulted in greater visual compromise. Methods: This study included 184 myopic children aged eight to 12 years, and 172 completed the trial. The participants were randomly assigned to wear IORC lenses with low (IORC-L, 2.50 D), medium (IORC-M, 3.50 D), or high (IORC-H, 4.50 D) MD or single-vision spectacle lenses (SVL). Distance and near best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and questionnaires were evaluated at baseline and after six and 12 months. Results: CSF over all frequencies and distance and near BCVA were not affected by lens design (all P > 0.05). The SVL group outperformed the three IORC lens groups in terms of ghosting images at baseline, and IORC-H and IORC-M groups outperformed IORC-L group (all P < 0.001); however, no differences were observed at the six- or 12-month visit. There were no significant differences among the four groups for any other subjective variables at any of the follow-up visits regarding vision clarity, vision stability, eyestrain, dizziness, headache, or overall vision satisfaction (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: The IORC lenses with an actual MD of 4.50 D provided acceptable objective and subjective visual performance and were well tolerated by children. Translational Relevance: IORC lenses with an actual MD of 4.50 D provided acceptable visual performance.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityEyeglassesMyopiaRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityChildChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38922628
PMCPMC11216273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.