Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922606›Full record

ReviewJAMA surgery2024

Preventing Surgical Site Infections in the Era of Escalating Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Stewardship.

Dustin R Long, Adam Cifu, Stephen J Salipante, Robert G Sawyer, Kaylie Machutta, John C Alverdy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Preparing the Bowel for Surgery in the Era of Microbiome Sciences.The Surgical clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dustin R LongDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Adam CifuDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Stephen J SalipanteDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Robert G SawyerDepartment of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of Medicine, Kalamazoo.
Kaylie MachuttaUniversity of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno.
John C AlverdyDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

PSEUDOMONAS'EFFECTS ON THE GUT BARRIER FROM SURGERYR01GM062344 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALVERDY, JOHN C · 2001 to 2025
$9.2M
Targeting the Patient Microbiome for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Spine SurgeryK23AR080209 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Dustin R Long · 2022 to 2026
$833k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR080209NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR079800NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM062344
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and governing bodies within the American College of Surgeons, the administration of antibiotics as prophylaxis against infection prior to a planned elective procedure is, with rare exception, routinely recommended. The goal of "getting to zero" infections remains a high priority for policymakers, practitioners, and certainly for patients. Observations: Despite the many advances in surgical technique, skin decontamination, sterile procedure, and enhanced recovery programs, surgical site infections continue to adversely affect procedures as diverse as dental implant surgery, joint arthroplasty, and major abdominal surgery. Although surgical site infection rates are at historically low levels, progress has stalled in recent reporting periods and such infections remain disabling, costly, and occasionally lethal. Stakeholders in the field, including surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, and industry, advocate for strategies emphasizing greater levels of intraoperative sterility or broader-spectrum antibiotic coverage as the most appropriate path forward. Conclusions and Relevance: The current emphasis on ever-increasing levels of intraoperative sterility and extended-spectrum antibiotic use are not sustainable long-term solutions. Continuing to escalate these approaches may contribute to unintended consequences including antimicrobial resistance. Principles of antimicrobial stewardship and microbiome sciences can be applied to inform a more effective and sustainable approach to infection prevention in the field of surgery.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisAntimicrobial StewardshipSurgical Wound InfectionDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38922606
PMCPMC11622804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.