Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922570›Full record

ReviewJournal of epidemiology and global health2024

International Newborn Screening: Where Are We in Saudi Arabia?

Noara Alhusseini, Yara Almuhanna, Lama Alabduljabbar, Soaad Alamri, Maryam Altayeb, Ghadi Askar, Noor Alsaadoun, Khadijah Ateq, Mariam M AlEissa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Progress and Prospects of Newborn Screening in China.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026
    Review
  5. Bilirubin rate of rise during routine 6-h transcutaneous bilirubin surveillance.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noara AlhusseiniMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Yara AlmuhannaMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama AlabduljabbarMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Soaad AlamriMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maryam AltayebMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ghadi AskarMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noor AlsaadounMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khadijah AteqKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. alqarnikh90@gmail.com.
Mariam M AlEissaMedical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newborn screening (NBS) programs are believed to play an important role in the decrease of infant mortality rates in many countries. This is achieved through offering early detection and treatment of many genetic as well as metabolic disorders prior to the onset of symptoms. Our paper examines NBS across seven diverse nations: Saudi Arabia, the United States, Japan, Singapore, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. This paper discusses the diseases screened for by each country, latest additions, as well as future recommendations, when applicable. Employing a comparative approach, we conducted a comprehensive review of the most recent published literature on NBS programs in each country and subsequently examined their latest implemented NBS guidelines as outlined on their respective official government health sector websites. We then reviewed the economic feasibility of each of these programs and factors that affect implementation and overall benefit. While all six countries employ well-developed programs, variations are observed. Those variations are mainly attributed to disparities in access, resource scarcity, financial availability, as well as ethical and cultural considerations. From a local perspective, we recommend conducting further population-based studies to assess the epidemiological data in relation to the disease burden on the country's economy. Moreover, we recommend updating national and international guidelines to contain a more comprehensive approach on policies, operation, and sustainability to deliver a service through the lens of value-based healthcare.

Indexed as

Neonatal ScreeningAustraliaCanadaHumansInfant, NewbornJapanSaudi ArabiaSingaporeUnited KingdomUnited StatesEarly interventionNewborn screening programNoncommunicable diseasesPreventionSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID38922570
PMCPMC11442708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.