ReviewJournal of epidemiology and global health2024
International Newborn Screening: Where Are We in Saudi Arabia?
Review in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Newborn screening and biobanking for preventable genetic disorders in Mongolia: A developing country perspective.Regenerative therapy · 2026Review
- Review
- Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders and Inborn Errors of Immunity in Saudi Arabia: Current Evidence on Epidemiology, Clinical Impact, and Healthcare System Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Progress and Prospects of Newborn Screening in China.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- Bilirubin rate of rise during routine 6-h transcutaneous bilirubin surveillance.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- The new frontier of newborn screening: integrating genomics, metabolomics, and data science for inborn errors of metabolism.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Review
- Newborn Screening in Saudi Arabia: Brief History, Current Practice, and Future Direction.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Review
- The role and future of the population health observatory: advancing public health intelligence in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preventive Practices Toward G6PD Deficiency in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetics and Clinical Findings Associated with Early-Onset Myopia and Retinal Detachment in Saudi Arabia.Genes · 2025Review
- Parents' perspectives on expanded newborn genomic screening in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.Human genomics · 2025Article
- Prevention and early intervention screening for inherited ocular diseases in Saudi Arabia: a national perspective.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Risk Factors of Malnutrition in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A 14-year Retrospective Study from Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) programs are believed to play an important role in the decrease of infant mortality rates in many countries. This is achieved through offering early detection and treatment of many genetic as well as metabolic disorders prior to the onset of symptoms. Our paper examines NBS across seven diverse nations: Saudi Arabia, the United States, Japan, Singapore, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. This paper discusses the diseases screened for by each country, latest additions, as well as future recommendations, when applicable. Employing a comparative approach, we conducted a comprehensive review of the most recent published literature on NBS programs in each country and subsequently examined their latest implemented NBS guidelines as outlined on their respective official government health sector websites. We then reviewed the economic feasibility of each of these programs and factors that affect implementation and overall benefit. While all six countries employ well-developed programs, variations are observed. Those variations are mainly attributed to disparities in access, resource scarcity, financial availability, as well as ethical and cultural considerations. From a local perspective, we recommend conducting further population-based studies to assess the epidemiological data in relation to the disease burden on the country's economy. Moreover, we recommend updating national and international guidelines to contain a more comprehensive approach on policies, operation, and sustainability to deliver a service through the lens of value-based healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.