ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2024
Revolutionizing food safety with electrochemical biosensors for rapid and portable pathogen detection.
Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biosensing technologies for foodborne pathogen detection and healthcare: principles, emerging materials, and intelligent platforms.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Portable electrochemical impedance biosensing with DRT-enabled machine learning for detectingFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Novel Approaches for Controlling and Analyzing Microorganisms in Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biosensing Strategies to Monitor Contaminants and Additives on Fish, Meat, Poultry, and Related Products.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Carbon-dot pequi-nut in the development of immunosensor to detect pathogenic bacteria.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foodborne diseases remain a worldwide concern, despite the advances made in sanitation, pathogen surveillance and food safety management systems. The methods routinely applied for detecting pathogens in foods are time consuming, labor intensive and usually require trained and qualified individuals. The objective of this review was to highlight the use of biosensors, with a focus on the electrochemical devices, as promising alternatives for detecting foodborne pathogens. These biosensors present high speed for obtaining results, with the possibility of evaluating foods in real time, at low cost, ease of use, in addition to being compact and portable. These aspects are considered advantageous and suitable for use in food safety management systems. This work also shows some limitations for the application of biosensors, and we present perspectives with the development and use of nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.