ReviewMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Artificial intelligence for neuro MRI acquisition: a review.
Review in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging Brain Science and Technology: How AI Is Shaping the Future of Neuroimaging in Autism.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging tissue bridges: An emerging biomarker for prognostication in traumatic spinal cord injury.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectTo review recent advances of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing the efficiency and throughput of the MRI acquisition workflow in neuroimaging, including planning, sequence design, and correction of acquisition artifacts. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive analysis was conducted on recent AI-based methods in neuro MRI acquisition. The study focused on key technological advances, their impact on clinical practice, and potential risks associated with these methods.
resultsThe findings indicate that AI-based algorithms have a substantial positive impact on the MRI acquisition process, improving both efficiency and throughput. Specific algorithms were identified as particularly effective in optimizing acquisition steps, with reported improvements in workflow efficiency. DISCUSSION: The review highlights the transformative potential of AI in neuro MRI acquisition, emphasizing the technological advances and clinical benefits. However, it also discusses potential risks and challenges, suggesting areas for future research to mitigate these concerns and further enhance AI integration in MRI acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38922525What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.