Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922517›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Long-Term Functional Outcome After Early vs. Late Stoma Closure in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Sub-analysis of the Multicenter FORCE Trial.

V M Meyer, N Bosch, J A G van der Heijden, A J Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, J P E N Pierie, G L Beets, P M A Broens, B R Klarenbeek, H L van Westreenen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Management of bowel dysfunction after pelvic surgery for endometriosis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

V M MeyerDept of Surgery, Isala Hospitals, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. meyervi@isala.nl.
N BoschDept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J A G van der HeijdenDept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
A J Kalkdijk-DijkstraDept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J P E N PieriePost Graduate School of Medicine (PGSOM), University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
G L BeetsDepartment of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P M A BroensDept of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B R KlarenbeekDept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
H L van WestreenenDept of Surgery, Isala Hospitals, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the effect of early stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer.

methodsPatients participating in the FORCE trial who underwent LAR with protective stoma were included in this study. Patients were subdivided into an early closure group (< 3 months) and late closure group (> 3 months). Endpoints of this study were the Wexner Incontinence, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), EORTC QLQ-CR29, and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scores at 1 year.

resultsBetween 2017 and 2020, 38 patients had received a diverting stoma after LAR for rectal cancer and could be included. There was no significant difference in LARS (31 vs. 30, p = 0.63) and Wexner score (6.2 vs. 5.8, p = 0.77) between the early and late closure groups. Time to stoma closure in days was not a predictor for LARS (R

conclusionTiming of stoma closure does not appear to affect long-term bowel function and quality of life, except for body image. To improve functional outcome, attention should be focused on other contributing factors.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceQuality of LifeRectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProctectomyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnorectal functionLow anterior resectionQuality of lifeRectal cancerStoma closure

Identifiers

PMID38922517
PMCPMC11347459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.