ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024
Quantitative and dynamic profiling of human gut core microbiota by real-time PCR.
Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fingerprint profiling human gut microbiota through boronic acid-based sensor array and its application on colorectal cancer classification.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Quantitative profiling of bacterial communities via full length 16S rRNA gene sequencing with internal controls: optimization and validation across diverse human microbiomes.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- A Spatiotemporal Atlas of the Gut Microbiota inBiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Effects of ethnicity and geography on the fecal microbiota and dietary habits of Tibeto-Burman hill tribes in Northern Thailand.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human gut microbiota refers to a diverse community of microorganisms that symbiotically exist in the human intestinal system. Altered microbial communities have been linked to many human pathologies. However, there is a lack of rapid and efficient methods to assess gut microbiota signatures in practice. To address this, we established an appraisal system containing 45 quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays targeting gut core microbes with high prevalence and/or abundance in the population. Through comparative genomic analysis, we selected novel species-specific genetic markers and primers for 31 of the 45 core microbes with no previously reported specific primers or whose primers needed improvement in specificity. We comprehensively evaluated the performance of the qPCR assays and demonstrated that they showed good sensitivity, selectivity, and quantitative linearity for each target. The limit of detection ranged from 0.1 to 1.0 pg/µL for the genomic DNA of these targets. We also demonstrated the high consistency (Pearson's r = 0.8688, P < 0.0001) between the qPCR method and metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) method in analyzing the abundance of selected bacteria in 22 human fecal samples. Moreover, we quantified the dynamic changes (over 8 weeks) of these core microbes in 14 individuals using qPCR, and considerable stability was demonstrated in most participants, albeit with significant individual differences. Overall, this study enables the simple and rapid quantification of 45 core microbes in the human gut, providing a promising tool to understand the role of gut core microbiota in human health and disease. KEY POINTS: • A panel of original qPCR assays was developed to quantify human gut core microbes. • The qPCR assays were evaluated and compared with mNGS using real fecal samples. • This method was used to dynamically profile the gut core microbiota in individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.