ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2024
[Graves' orbitopathy as the cause of diplopia in old age-Differences between young and old].
Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Muscle tendon elongation with bovine pericardium (Tutopatch®) in patients with Graves' orbitopathy; a prospective, observational, multicentre study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndocrine orbitopathy (EO) is an autoimmune disease mostly associated with a disease of the thyroid gland, which leads to inflammation, adipogenesis and fibrosis. The severity of EO can vary greatly between individuals, which makes it difficult to exactly predict the natural course of the disease; however, this is important to be able to individually adapt the treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical features, course, treatment and prognosis for patients with EO under 50 years old with older patients. The results of the study with a focus on motility are presented in this special issue. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe hospital records of a randomly selected sample of 1000 patients from the EO databank in Essen (GODE), which includes 4260 patients, were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 ≤50 years and group 2 >50 years. Only patients with complete data sets were included in the statistical analyses.
resultsYounger patients (n = 484) presented significantly more frequently with milder EO (53% vs. 33%, p < 0.0001), whereas older patients (n = 448) more frequently suffered from moderate or severe forms (44% vs. 64%, p < 0.0001). Older patients showed more severe strabismus, motility and clinical activity scores (5.9 vs. 2.3 prism diopters, PD/310° vs. 330°, both p < 0.0001, CAS 2.1 vs. 1.7, p = 0.001). Proptosis and the occurrence of optic nerve compression showed no significant differences between the groups (3% each). Multiple logistic regression showed that the necessity for a second eye muscle surgery was most strongly associated with a previous decompression (OR = 0.12, 95 % CI 0.1-0.2, p < 0.0001), followed by orbital irradiation and age.
conclusionIn summary, younger patients with EO presented with milder clinical features, such as a lower rate of restrictive motility disorders and weaker expression of signs of inflammation. Therefore, older patients needed steroids, irradiation, eyelid and eye muscle surgery more frequently; however, the risk of dysthyroid optic neuropathy and the necessity of a second eye surgery were not or only slightly associated with age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38922402What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.