ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2024
Prevalence and clinical implications of bloodstream infections in intensive care patients with or without burn injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antimicrobial treatment for 7 versus 14 days in patients with bacteremia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Infection · 2025Pooled it
- Editorial: Current evidence on epidemiology and management of infections in critically ill patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Enrichment of H3S28p and H3K9me2 Epigenetic Marks on Inflammatory-Associated Gene Promoters in Response to Severe Burn Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSevere burn injuries are often accompanied by infections and associated with high morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and clinical impact of bacteremia between patients receiving intensive care with and without burns.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study at the University Hospital Vienna, Austria, analyzed blood cultures from intensive care unit (ICU) patients with and without burns (2012-2022) to assess the prevalence of bacteremia, the associated pathogen distribution and the 60-day all-cause mortality.
resultsIn 1170 ICU patients, 303 with burns and 867 without, the prevalence of bacteremia was similar among patients with at least one blood culture (31/157 [19.7%] versus 44/213 [20.7%], OR [95%CI] = 0.95 [0.57-1.57]). Burn patients exhibited a significantly higher frequency of microbiological sampling (51.5% versus 24.5%, p < 0.001), resulting in a higher overall prevalence of bacteremia (10.2% versus 5.1%, p = 0.002). 16.2% of all identified pathogens were multidrug-resistant (MDR). The 60-day all-cause mortality was higher in patients with MDR pathogens than in patients without bacteremia (41.7% versus 10.6%, p = 0.026).
conclusionBacteremia prevalence was similar in burn and non-burn patients, with high rates of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. The 60-day all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with MDR pathogens than in patients without bacteremia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.