Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922374›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Can blood-based markers predict RECIST progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy?

Melda Yeghaian, Teresa M Tareco Bucho, Melissa de Bruin, Alexander Schmitz, Zuhir Bodalal, Egbert F Smit, Regina G H Beets-Tan, Daan van den Broek, Stefano Trebeschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Melda YeghaianGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Teresa M Tareco BuchoGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Melissa de BruinRadiology Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander SchmitzRadiology Department, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Zuhir BodalalGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Egbert F SmitPulmonology Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Daan van den BroekDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stefano TrebeschiGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. stefano.trebeschi@maastrichtuniversity.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the potential of routine blood markers, serum tumour markers and their combination in predicting RECIST-defined progression in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

methodsWe employed time-varying statistical models and machine learning classifiers in a Monte Carlo cross-validation approach to investigate the association between RECIST-defined progression and blood markers, serum tumour markers and their combination, in a retrospective cohort of 164 patients with NSCLC.

resultsThe performance of the routine blood markers in the prediction of progression free survival was moderate. Serum tumour markers and their combination with routine blood markers generally improved performance compared to routine blood markers alone. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ranked as the top predictive routine blood markers, and CYFRA 21.1 was consistently among the most predictive serum tumour markers. Using these classifiers to predict overall survival yielded moderate to high performance, even when cases of death-defined progression were excluded. Performance varied across the treatment journey.

conclusionRoutine blood tests, especially when combined with serum tumour markers, show moderate predictive value  of RECIST-defined progression in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The relationship between overall survival and RECIST-defined progression may be influenced by confounding factors.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease ProgressionImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBlood-based markersImmunotherapyMachine learningNSCLCProgression-free survivalRECIST

Identifiers

PMID38922374
PMCPMC11208229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.