Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922363›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

The unseen impact - a deep dive into neurocognitive impairment among patients with intracranial meningiomas: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature.

Mohammed A Fouda, Samantha Kallman, Rebecca Boorstin, Amanda Sacks-Zimmerman, Susan C Pannullo, H Allison Bender

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mapping the neurocognitive landscape of pediatric Chiari malformation type I: a scoping review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed A FoudaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Maf4023@med.cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8884-7289
Samantha KallmanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Rebecca BoorstinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Amanda Sacks-ZimmermanDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Susan C PannulloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
H Allison BenderDepartment of Neurological Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 East 68th Street, Box 99, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors, predominantly affecting adults, with a higher incidence in female and elderly populations. Despite their prevalence, research on neurocognitive impairment in meningioma patients remains limited compared to intra-axial tumors such as gliomas. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature on neurocognitive outcomes in meningioma patients pre- and post-surgery. Our review revealed significant disparities in reported neurocognitive outcomes, with prospective studies suggesting tumor-related factors as the primary contributors to postoperative deficits, while retrospective studies imply surgical intervention plays a significant role. Regardless of study design or specifics, most studies lack baseline preoperative neurocognitive assessments and standardized protocols for evaluating neurocognitive function. To address these gaps, we advocate for standardized neurocognitive assessment protocols, consensus on neurocognitive domains to be targeted in this population by tailored test batteries, and more prospective studies to elucidate correlations between tumor characteristics, patient attributes, surgical interventions, neurocognitive status, and planning for implementing tailored neurocognitive rehabilitation strategies early in the postoperative course which is crucial for achieving optimal long-term neurocognitive outcomes and enhancing patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaCognitive DysfunctionHumansNeurocognitive DisordersNeuropsychological TestsNeurosurgical ProceduresQuality of LifeMeningiomaNeurocognitive functionNeurocognitive rehabilitationWorking memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.