SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
The unseen impact - a deep dive into neurocognitive impairment among patients with intracranial meningiomas: a comprehensive systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Hidden impacts, visible deficits: a comprehensive systematic literature review of the cognitive impairment in patients with Chiari malformation type I.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Mapping the neurocognitive landscape of pediatric Chiari malformation type I: a scoping review of the literature.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Neurocognitive evaluation in patients with intracranial Meningiomas: A systematic review.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- Surgical treatment of meningiomas improves neurocognitive functioning and quality of life - a prospective single-center study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most common intracranial tumors, predominantly affecting adults, with a higher incidence in female and elderly populations. Despite their prevalence, research on neurocognitive impairment in meningioma patients remains limited compared to intra-axial tumors such as gliomas. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the current literature on neurocognitive outcomes in meningioma patients pre- and post-surgery. Our review revealed significant disparities in reported neurocognitive outcomes, with prospective studies suggesting tumor-related factors as the primary contributors to postoperative deficits, while retrospective studies imply surgical intervention plays a significant role. Regardless of study design or specifics, most studies lack baseline preoperative neurocognitive assessments and standardized protocols for evaluating neurocognitive function. To address these gaps, we advocate for standardized neurocognitive assessment protocols, consensus on neurocognitive domains to be targeted in this population by tailored test batteries, and more prospective studies to elucidate correlations between tumor characteristics, patient attributes, surgical interventions, neurocognitive status, and planning for implementing tailored neurocognitive rehabilitation strategies early in the postoperative course which is crucial for achieving optimal long-term neurocognitive outcomes and enhancing patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38922363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.