ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2024
Tumor-Agnostic Genomic and Clinical Analysis of BRAF Fusions Identifies Actionable Targets.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type II RAF Inhibitor Tovorafenib in Recurrent/Refractory Melanoma or Other Solid Tumors WithJCO precision oncology · 2026Trial
- Clinicopathological and molecular features of uterine smooth muscle tumours in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Novel BRAF fusion in Erdheim-Chester disease with pulmonary manifestations: Importance of RNA-based testing and response to MEK inhibition.Histopathology · 2026Article
- Histopathologic, molecular, and clinical associations of fusion-positive gastrointestinal carcinomas.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Targeting fusion proteins in solid tumors: from oncogenic mechanisms to clinical interventions.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Review
- Unveiling a new SORBS2::BRAF fusion in papillary thyroid carcinoma: insights from molecular diagnostics.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Genome-based classification of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma reveals similarities to KRAS wild-type PDAC.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Response to a novel type II RAF inhibitor in diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor with BRAF fusion.The oncologist · 2025Article
- Oncogenic gene fusions in cancer: from biology to therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Exploring the pathway: clinical utility and open challenges of targeting BRAF alterations in biliary tract cancers and gastrointestinal malignancies.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEven though BRAF fusions are increasingly detected in standard multigene next-generation sequencing panels, few reports have explored their structure and impact on clinical course. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe collected data from patients with BRAF fusion-positive cancers identified through a genotyping protocol of 97,024 samples. Fusions were characterized and reviewed for oncogenic potential (in-frame status, non-BRAF partner gene, and intact BRAF kinase domain).
resultsWe found 241 BRAF fusion-positive tumors from 212 patients with 82 unique 5' fusion partners spanning 52 histologies. Thirty-nine fusion partners were not previously reported, and 61 were identified once. BRAF fusion incidence was enriched in pilocytic astrocytomas, gangliogliomas, low-grade neuroepithelial tumors, and acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas. Twenty-four patients spanning multiple histologies were treated with MAPK-directed therapies, of which 20 were evaluable for RECIST. Best response was partial response (N = 2), stable disease (N = 11), and progressive disease (N = 7). The median time on therapy was 1 month with MEK plus BRAF inhibitors [(N = 11), range 0-18 months] and 8 months for MEK inhibitors [(N = 14), range 1-26 months]. Nine patients remained on treatment for longer than 6 months [pilocytic astrocytomas (N = 6), Erdheim-Chester disease (N = 1), extraventricular neurocytoma (N = 1), and melanoma (N = 1)]. Fifteen patients had acquired BRAF fusions.
conclusionsBRAF fusions are found across histologies and represent an emerging actionable target. BRAF fusions have a diverse set of fusion partners. Durable responses to MAPK therapies were seen, particularly in pilocytic astrocytomas. Acquired BRAF fusions were identified after targeted therapy, underscoring the importance of postprogression biopsies to optimize treatment at relapse in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.