Transgenerational Response of Germline Nuclear Hormone Receptor Genes to Nanoplastics at Predicted Environmental Doses in

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Nanomaterials' Multigenerational Effects by Single and Joint Exposure in Non-mammalian Models.Environmental toxicology · 2026
   Review
2. Genotoxic, Cytotoxic, and Physiological Effects of Nano- and Microplastics in Invertebrate Model Organisms: Mechanistic Integration, Adverse Outcome Pathways, and Multi-Omics Perspectives.Toxics · 2026
   Review
3. Long-Term Exposure to 6-PPD Quinone Inhibits Glutamate Synthesis and Glutamate Receptor Function Associated with Its Toxicity Induction inToxics · 2025
   Article
4. Comparison of Transgenerational Neurotoxicity between Pristine and Amino-Modified Nanoplastics inToxics · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as