ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2024
Optimizing Performance of Transformer-based Models for Fetal Brain MR Image Segmentation.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07059286 (The Combination of Maternal Risk Factors and Functional/Structural Connectivity in Fetuses and Neonates to Predict Neurodevelopment From Birth Through Early Childhood), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Combination of Maternal Risk Factors and Functional/Structural Connectivity in Fetuses and Neonates to Predict Neurodevelopment From Birth Through Early Childhood: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal landmark detection and classification of fetal growth conditions on obstetric ultrasound: a gestational age-conditioned multi-task network.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Macrotrabecular-massive subtype in hepatocellular carcinoma based on contrast-enhanced CT: deep learning outperforms machine learning.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Carotid artery segmentation in computed tomography angiography (CTA) using multi-scale deep supervision with Swin-UNet and advanced data augmentation.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Accurate and robust segmentation of cerebral distal small arteries by DVNet with dual contextual path and vascular attention enhancement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Transformers in the Womb: Swin-UNETR Takes on Fetal Brain Imaging.Radiology. Artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To test the performance of a transformer-based model when manipulating pretraining weights, dataset size, and input size and comparing the best model with the reference standard and state-of-the-art models for a resting-state functional (rs-fMRI) fetal brain extraction task. Materials and Methods An internal retrospective dataset (172 fetuses, 519 images; collected 2018-2022) was used to investigate influence of dataset size, pretraining approaches, and image input size on Swin-U-Net transformer (UNETR) and UNETR models. The internal and external (131 fetuses, 561 images) datasets were used to cross-validate and to assess generalization capability of the best model versus state-of-the-art models on different scanner types and number of gestational weeks (GWs). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the balanced average Hausdorff distance (BAHD) were used as segmentation performance metrics. Generalized equation estimation multifactorial models were used to assess significant model and interaction effects of interest. Results The Swin-UNETR model was not affected by the pretraining approach and dataset size and performed best with the mean dataset image size, with a mean DSC of 0.92 and BAHD of 0.097. Swin-UNETR was not affected by scanner type. Generalization results on the internal dataset showed that Swin-UNETR had lower performance compared with the reference standard models and comparable performance on the external dataset. Cross-validation on internal and external test sets demonstrated better and comparable performance of Swin-UNETR versus convolutional neural network architectures during the late-fetal period (GWs > 25) but lower performance during the midfetal period (GWs ≤ 25). Conclusion Swin-UNTER showed flexibility in dealing with smaller datasets, regardless of pretraining approaches. For fetal brain extraction from rs-fMR images, Swin-UNTER showed comparable performance with that of reference standard models during the late-fetal period and lower performance during the early GW period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.