Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38922031›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2024

Optimizing Performance of Transformer-based Models for Fetal Brain MR Image Segmentation.

Nicolò Pecco, Pasquale Anthony Della Rosa, Matteo Canini, Gianluca Nocera, Paola Scifo, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Massimo Candiani, Andrea Falini, Antonella Castellano, Cristina Baldoli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07059286 (The Combination of Maternal Risk Factors and Functional/Structural Connectivity in Fetuses and Neonates to Predict Neurodevelopment From Birth Through Early Childhood), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07059286 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Combination of Maternal Risk Factors and Functional/Structural Connectivity in Fetuses and Neonates to Predict Neurodevelopment From Birth Through Early Childhood: A Single-Center Observational Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorIRCCS San RaffaeleRan2025 to 2033Enrolled160ConditionsPregnancy, Neurodevelopment, Brain Connectivity, Neurodevelopment OutcomeArmsMaternal Frailty Inventory (MaFra) Questionnaire, Fetal Resting-State Functional MRI, Maternal Emotional Reactivity, Neonatal Resting-State Functional MRI, Longitudinal Neurodevelopmental Testing Battery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicolò PeccoFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-6367-7903
Pasquale Anthony Della RosaFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-3137-1731
Matteo CaniniFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-9601-1534
Gianluca NoceraFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-8499-5257
Paola ScifoFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0001-5135-8086
Paolo Ivo CavorettoFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0001-8097-366X
Massimo CandianiFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).
Andrea FaliniFrom the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-1461-8755
Antonella Castellano *From the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-4137-9016
Cristina Baldoli *From the Neuroradiology Unit and CERMAC (N.P., P.A.D.R., M. Canini, G.N., A.F., A.C., C.B.) and Departments of Nuclear Medicine (P.S.) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.I.C., M. Candiani), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 58-60, 20132 Milan, Italy; and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy (N.P., G.N., M. Candiani, A.F., A.C.).ORCID 0000-0003-2697-5132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To test the performance of a transformer-based model when manipulating pretraining weights, dataset size, and input size and comparing the best model with the reference standard and state-of-the-art models for a resting-state functional (rs-fMRI) fetal brain extraction task. Materials and Methods An internal retrospective dataset (172 fetuses, 519 images; collected 2018-2022) was used to investigate influence of dataset size, pretraining approaches, and image input size on Swin-U-Net transformer (UNETR) and UNETR models. The internal and external (131 fetuses, 561 images) datasets were used to cross-validate and to assess generalization capability of the best model versus state-of-the-art models on different scanner types and number of gestational weeks (GWs). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the balanced average Hausdorff distance (BAHD) were used as segmentation performance metrics. Generalized equation estimation multifactorial models were used to assess significant model and interaction effects of interest. Results The Swin-UNETR model was not affected by the pretraining approach and dataset size and performed best with the mean dataset image size, with a mean DSC of 0.92 and BAHD of 0.097. Swin-UNETR was not affected by scanner type. Generalization results on the internal dataset showed that Swin-UNETR had lower performance compared with the reference standard models and comparable performance on the external dataset. Cross-validation on internal and external test sets demonstrated better and comparable performance of Swin-UNETR versus convolutional neural network architectures during the late-fetal period (GWs > 25) but lower performance during the midfetal period (GWs ≤ 25). Conclusion Swin-UNTER showed flexibility in dealing with smaller datasets, regardless of pretraining approaches. For fetal brain extraction from rs-fMR images, Swin-UNTER showed comparable performance with that of reference standard models during the late-fetal period and lower performance during the early GW period.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFetusHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesCNNDataset SizeInput SizeMedical Imaging SegmentationMRITransfer LearningTransformers

Identifiers

PMID38922031
PMCPMC11605146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.