ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Hybridizing Deep Neural Networks and Machine Learning Models for Aerial Satellite Forest Image Segmentation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GANCIU-Geospatial Analysis with Neural Classification and Image Understanding.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Optimizing Deep Learning Models for Climate-Related Natural Disaster Detection from UAV Images and Remote Sensing Data.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- IngredSAM: Open-World Food Ingredient Segmentation via a Single Image Prompt.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forests play a pivotal role in mitigating climate change as well as contributing to the socio-economic activities of many countries. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to monitor forest cover. Traditional machine learning classifiers for segmenting images lack the ability to extract features such as the spatial relationship between pixels and texture, resulting in subpar segmentation results when used alone. To address this limitation, this study proposed a novel hybrid approach that combines deep neural networks and machine learning algorithms to segment an aerial satellite image into forest and non-forest regions. Aerial satellite forest image features were first extracted by two deep neural network models, namely, VGG16 and ResNet50. The resulting features are subsequently used by five machine learning classifiers including Random Forest (RF), Linear Support Vector Machines (LSVM), k-nearest neighbor (kNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), and Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB) to perform the final segmentation. The aerial satellite forest images were obtained from a deep globe challenge dataset. The performance of the proposed model was evaluated using metrics such as Accuracy, Jaccard score index, and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). The experimental results revealed that the RF model achieved the best segmentation results with accuracy, Jaccard score, and RMSE of 94%, 0.913 and 0.245, respectively; followed by LSVM with accuracy, Jaccard score and RMSE of 89%, 0.876, 0.332, respectively. The LDA took the third position with accuracy, Jaccard score, and RMSE of 88%, 0.834, and 0.351, respectively, followed by GNB with accuracy, Jaccard score, and RMSE of 88%, 0.837, and 0.353, respectively. The kNN occupied the last position with accuracy, Jaccard score, and RMSE of 83%, 0.790, and 0.408, respectively. The experimental results also revealed that the proposed model has significantly improved the performance of the RF, LSVM, LDA, GNB and kNN models, compared to their performance when used to segment the images alone. Furthermore, the results showed that the proposed model outperformed other models from related studies, thereby, attesting its superior segmentation capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.