Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38921493›Full record

ArticleMembranes2024

Chemical-Saving Potential for Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Processes Based on Long-Term Pilot Trials.

Sofia Lovisa Andersson, Christian Baresel, Sofia Andersson, Klara Westling, Mikael Eriksson, Andrea Carranza Munoz, Gabriel Persson, Mayumi Narongin-Fujikawa, Kristin Johansson, Tomas Rydberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Replacing methanol with internally produced VFA-based carbon source for denitrification at the Henriksdal WWTP.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sofia Lovisa AnderssonStockholm Vatten Och Avfall AB, 106 36 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4344-0236
Christian BareselIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0740-0651
Sofia AnderssonSweco Environment, Gjörwellsgatan 22, 112 60 Stockholm, Sweden.
Klara WestlingSvenskt Vatten, P.O. Box 14057, 167 14 Bromma, Sweden.
Mikael ErikssonIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrea Carranza MunozIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Gabriel PerssonStockholm Vatten Och Avfall AB, 106 36 Stockholm, Sweden.
Mayumi Narongin-FujikawaIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristin JohanssonIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.
Tomas RydbergIVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, P.O. Box 21060, 100 31 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-5680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) have gained attraction in municipal wastewater treatment because of their capacity to meet strict water quality standards and support water reuse. Despite this, their operational sustainability is often compromised by high resource consumption, especially regarding the use of chemicals for membrane cleaning. This study explores innovative membrane-cleaning strategies to enhance the sustainability of MBR processes. Through long-term pilot trials at Stockholm's largest wastewater treatment plant, this study showed that alternative cleaning strategies can reduce chemical use by up to 75% without sacrificing treatment performance. The results further suggest that these alternative strategies could result in cost reductions of up to 70% and a reduction in environmental impacts by as much as 95% for certain indicators. Given that MBRs play a crucial role in addressing increasing treatment demands and advancing circular water management, the outcomes of this study are beneficial for the broader adoption of MBR processes. These results also have implications for existing installations, offering a pathway to more sustainable wastewater treatment. Moreover, the presented cleaning strategies provide significant opportunities for lowering operational costs and reducing the environmental footprint of new and existing MBR installations.

Indexed as

cleaning chemicalscost savingenvironmental impactmembrane bioreactormembrane cleaningresource efficiencywastewater treatment

Identifiers

PMID38921493
PMCPMC11205864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.