ArticleMetabolites2024
Multidimensional Assessment of Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity in Geriatric Patients: Creatinine/Cystatin C Ratio Performs Better than Sarcopenia Index.
Article in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of biomarkers of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Pathophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomarker Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Revisiting the Sarcopenic Index in Older Adults with Reduced Kidney Function: Association with EWGSOP2-Defined Probable Sarcopenia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cystatin C Mirrors Fibrosis Burden in Metabolic Syndrome: Insights from the Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fibrosis-5 Score.Metabolites · 2026Article
- Enhancing eGFR cr-cys Accuracy in Extreme Body Mass Index Groups : Addressing Body Composition and Methodological Heterogeneity.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Identification of a High Visceral Adiposity Phenotype: A Cluster Analysis-Based Stratification of NAFLD Risk in the Elderly.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Development of machine learning-based models for predicting sarcopenia risk in stroke patients and analysis of associated factors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of the non-HDL cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio with possible sarcopenic obesity in Chinese adults.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The serum creatinine/cystatin C ratio (CCR) and the sarcopenia index (SI) are novel indicators for sarcopenia, but their accuracy may depend on various confounders. To assess CCR and SI diagnostic accuracy, we studied the clinical and biophysical parameters associated with sarcopenia or sarcopenic obesity. A total of 79 elderly patients (65-99 yrs, 33 females) underwent clinical, anthropometric, body composition, geriatric performance, and blood chemistry evaluation. The CCR and SI accuracy were assessed to identify sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was confirmed in 40.5%, and sarcopenic obesity in 8.9% of the subjects. Sarcopenic patients showed an increased Charlson comorbidity index, cardiovascular disease (CVD) rates and frailty, and decreased physical performance than non-sarcopenic subjects. Patients with sarcopenic obesity had increased body fat and inflammatory markers compared to obese subjects without sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was associated with a decreased CCR and SI. However, when the logistic regression models were adjusted for possible confounders (i.e., age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, presence of CVD, and frailty score), a significant OR was confirmed for the CCR (OR 0.021, 95% CI 0.00055-0.83) but not for the SI. The AUC for the CCR for sarcopenia discrimination was 0.72. A higher performance was observed in patients without chronic kidney diseases (CKD, AUC 0.83). CCR, more than the SI, is a useful, non-invasive, and cost-effective tool to predict sarcopenia, irrespective of the potential confounders, particularly in subjects without CKD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.