Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38921333›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Teaching and Learning Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Education: A Student Training Course.

Paula Leal, Ana Poeira, Diana Arvelos Mendes, Nara Batalha, Hugo Franco, Lucília Nunes, Fernanda Marques, Ljubiša Pađen, Małgorzata Stefaniak, Ana Pérez-Perdomo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Paula LealESEL Nursing School of Lisbon, 1600-190 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-3360
Ana PoeiraInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-7526
Diana Arvelos MendesInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7239-8167
Nara BatalhaInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0133-7150
Hugo FrancoInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5364-6751
Lucília NunesInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2684-7213
Fernanda MarquesInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-944X
Ljubiša PađenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-1701-3070
Małgorzata StefaniakFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0319-6067
Ana Pérez-PerdomoHospital Clinic of Barcelona, Fundacio Clinic per a la Recerca Biomedica, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1067-8344
Lore BangelsUniversity Colleges Leuven-Limburg, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Kathleen LemmensHBO Verpleegkunde Genk, 3600 Genk, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0003-1093-0906
Guida AmaralInstituto Politécnico de Setúbal, Escola Superior de Saúde, Campus do IPS-Estefanilha, 2910-470 Setúbal, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6691-1331

Funding

Erasmus+ KA220 HED Cooperation Partnerships in Higher Education 2021-1-BE02-KA220-HED-000023194Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal, RAADRI program. x
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is an essential component of nursing. It has emerged as a concept that integrates the core competencies of quality and safety education for nurses. In cooperation with five European partners, Instituto Politécnico de Setúbal (IPS) realized the "Clinical Reasoning in Nursing and Midwifery Education and Practice" project as part of the Erasmus+ project. As a partner, our team designed a multiplier event-the student training course. The aim of this report is to describe the construction and development of this clinical reasoning training course for nursing students. We outline the pedagogical approach of an undergraduate training course on clinical reasoning in 2023, which we separated into four stages: (i) welcoming, (ii) knowledge exploration, (iii) pedagogical learning, and (iv) sharing experience. This paper presents the learning outcomes of the collaborative reflection on and integration of the clinical reasoning concept among nursing students. This educational experience fostered reflection and discussion within the teaching team of the nursing department regarding the concept, models, and teaching/learning methods for clinical reasoning, with the explicit inclusion of clinical reasoning content in the nursing curriculum. We highlight the importance of implementing long-term pedagogical strategies in nursing education.

Indexed as

clinical reasoningnursing educationnursing studentsteaching

Identifiers

PMID38921333
PMCPMC11202887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.