Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38921217›Full record

ReviewBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Review Delving into the Factors Influencing Mycelium-Based Green Composites (MBCs) Production and Their Properties for Long-Term Sustainability Targets.

Worawoot Aiduang, Kritsana Jatuwong, Thatsanee Luangharn, Praween Jinanukul, Wandee Thamjaree, Thana Teeraphantuvat, Tanut Waroonkun, Saisamorn Lumyong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Worawoot AiduangOffice of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Kritsana JatuwongOffice of Research Administration, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Thatsanee LuangharnCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-6735
Praween JinanukulFaculty of Architecture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Wandee ThamjareeDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Thana TeeraphantuvatNorthfield Mount Hermon School, Mount Hermon, MA 01354, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8645-0965
Tanut WaroonkunFaculty of Architecture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9163-1144
Saisamorn LumyongDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Funding

The CMU Proactive Researcher program, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand. 828/2566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycelium-based green composites (MBCs) represent an eco-friendly material innovation with vast potential across diverse applications. This paper provides a thorough review of the factors influencing the production and properties of MBCs, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary collaboration and long-term sustainability goals. It delves into critical aspects such as fungal species selection, substrate type selection, substrate preparation, optimal conditions, dehydrating methods, post-processing techniques, mold design, sterilization processes, cost comparison, key recommendations, and other necessary factors. Regarding fungal species selection, the paper highlights the significance of considering factors like mycelium species, decay type, hyphal network systems, growth rate, and bonding properties in ensuring the safety and suitability of MBCs fabrication. Substrate type selection is discussed, emphasizing the importance of chemical characteristics such as cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin content, pH, organic carbon, total nitrogen, and the C: N ratio in determining mycelium growth and MBC properties. Substrate preparation methods, optimal growth conditions, and post-processing techniques are thoroughly examined, along with their impacts on MBCs quality and performance. Moreover, the paper discusses the importance of designing molds and implementing effective sterilization processes to ensure clean environments for mycelium growth. It also evaluates the costs associated with MBCs production compared to traditional materials, highlighting potential cost savings and economic advantages. Additionally, the paper provides key recommendations and precautions for improving MBC properties, including addressing fungal strain degeneration, encouraging research collaboration, establishing biosecurity protocols, ensuring regulatory compliance, optimizing storage conditions, implementing waste management practices, conducting life cycle assessments, and suggesting parameters for desirable MBC properties. Overall, this review offers valuable insights into the complex interplay of factors influencing MBCs production and provides guidance for optimizing processes to achieve sustainable, high-quality composites for diverse applications.

Indexed as

alternative materialsgreen compositesmycelium technologySDGs8 and 9sustainability

Identifiers

PMID38921217
PMCPMC11202202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.