ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Neuromorphic Sensor Based on Force-Sensing Resistors.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Spiking Neuron with Sensing Coil Based on a Volatile Memristor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- SpiKon-E: Hybrid Soft Artificial Muscle Control Using Hardware Spiking Neural Network.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This work introduces a neuromorphic sensor (NS) based on force-sensing resistors (FSR) and spiking neurons for robotic systems. The proposed sensor integrates the FSR in the schematic of the spiking neuron in order to make the sensor generate spikes with a frequency that depends on the applied force. The performance of the proposed sensor is evaluated in the control of a SMA-actuated robotic finger by monitoring the force during a steady state when the finger pushes on a tweezer. For comparison purposes, we performed a similar evaluation when the SNN received input from a widely used compression load cell (CLC). The results show that the proposed FSR-based neuromorphic sensor has very good sensitivity to low forces and the function between the spiking rate and the applied force is continuous, with good variation range. However, when compared to the CLC, the response of the NS follows a logarithmic-like function with improved sensitivity for small forces. In addition, the power consumption of NS is 128 µW that is 270 times lower than that of the CLC which needs 3.5 mW to operate. These characteristics make the neuromorphic sensor with FSR suitable for bioinspired control of humanoid robotics, representing a low-power and low-cost alternative to the widely used sensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.