ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Application Potential of Artificial Intelligence and Numerical Simulation in the Research and Formulation Design of Drilling Fluid Gel Performance.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drilling fluid is pivotal for efficient drilling. However, the gelation performance of drilling fluids is influenced by various complex factors, and traditional methods are inefficient and costly. Artificial intelligence and numerical simulation technologies have become transformative tools in various disciplines. This work reviews the application of four artificial intelligence techniques-expert systems, artificial neural networks (ANNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and genetic algorithms-and three numerical simulation techniques-computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and Monte Carlo simulations-in drilling fluid design and performance optimization. It analyzes the current issues in these studies, pointing out that challenges in applying these two technologies to drilling fluid gelation performance research include difficulties in obtaining field data and overly idealized model assumptions. From the literature review, it can be estimated that 52.0% of the papers are related to ANNs. Leakage issues are the primary concern for practitioners studying drilling fluid gelation performance, accounting for over 17% of research in this area. Based on this, and in conjunction with the technical requirements of drilling fluids and the development needs of drilling intelligence theory, three development directions are proposed: (1) Emphasize feature engineering and data preprocessing to explore the application potential of interpretable artificial intelligence. (2) Establish channels for open access to data or large-scale oil and gas field databases. (3) Conduct in-depth numerical simulation research focusing on the microscopic details of the spatial network structure of drilling fluids, reducing or even eliminating data dependence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.