Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920801›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Prototype or Exemplar Representations in the 5/5 Category Learning Task.

Fang Chen, Peijuan Li, Hao Chen, Carol A Seger, Zhiya Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fang ChenCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0009-0003-2270-6709
Peijuan LiCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0009-0002-5149-4090
Hao ChenCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Carol A SegerCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Zhiya LiuCenter for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5686-9678

Funding

The MOE Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities 22JJD190006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of category learning have typically focused on how the underlying category structure affects the category representations acquired by learners. However, there is limited research as to how other factors affect what representations are learned and utilized and how representations might change across the time course of learning. We used a novel "5/5" categorization task developed from the well-studied 5/4 task with the addition of one more stimulus to clarify an ambiguity in the 5/4 prototypes. We used multiple methods including computational modeling to identify whether participants categorized on the basis of exemplar or prototype representations. We found that, overall, for the stimuli we used (schematic robot-like stimuli), learning was best characterized by the use of prototypes. Most importantly, we found that relative use of prototype and exemplar strategies changed across learning, with use of exemplar representations decreasing and prototype representations increasing across blocks.

Indexed as

5/5 category structurecategory learningcomputational modelexemplar representationprototype representation

Identifiers

PMID38920801
PMCPMC11200643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.