Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920764›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Self-Esteem and Risk Behaviours in Adolescents: A Systematic Review.

Elena Martínez-Casanova, María Del Mar Molero-Jurado, María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Self-esteem in adolescents with obesity: a scoping review.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Self-reported knowledge, attitude and mental health status of in-school adolescents in Nigeria.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena Martínez-CasanovaDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0009-0001-5378-385X
María Del Mar Molero-JuradoDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9187-1474
María Del Carmen Pérez-FuentesDepartment of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-5175

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN) y la Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI) PID2020-119411RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is recognised as a notoriously vulnerable period in the human life cycle. Influenced by a complex interplay of biological, psychological and social factors, adolescents show a marked propensity to engage in risk behaviours. A systematic review was conducted of studies published in the Web of Science, PsycInfo and MEDLINE databases over the last decade, with the aim of collecting studies on the relationship between self-esteem and risk behaviour in individuals aged 12-18 years. The aim was to confirm the role of high self-esteem as a consistent protective factor against risk behaviour. The results show that self-esteem is negatively related to risk behaviour. Our results also reflect the need for further research on how sociodemographic factors, among others, affect the relationship between self-esteem and risk behaviours. This review highlights the relevance of implementing specific educational interventions to strengthen self-esteem in adolescents, with the aim of preventing various risk behaviours that may emerge during adolescence and persist throughout life if not addressed early.

Indexed as

cross-sectional studiesrisk behavioursself-esteemsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38920764
PMCPMC11201250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.