ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Purported Self-Organized Criticality of the Cardiovascular Function: Methodological Considerations for Zipf's Law Analysis.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-organized criticality is a universal theory for dynamical systems that has recently been applied to the cardiovascular system. Precise methodological approaches are essential for understanding the dynamics of cardiovascular self-organized criticality. This study examines how the duration and quality of data recording affect the analysis of cardiovascular self-organized criticality, with a focus on the beat-by-beat heart rate variability time series obtained from seven healthy subjects in a standing position. Drawing a Zipf diagram, we evaluated the distribution of cardiovascular events of bradycardia and tachycardia. We identified tipping points for the distribution of both bradycardia and tachycardia events. By varying the recording durations (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 min) and sampling frequencies (500, 250, and 100 Hz), we investigated their influence on the observed distributions. While shorter recordings can effectively capture cardiovascular events, they may underestimate the variables describing their distribution. Additionally, the tipping point of the Zipf distribution differs between bradycardia and tachycardia events. Comparisons of the distribution of bradycardia and tachycardia events should be conducted using long data recordings. Utilizing devices with lower sampling frequencies may compromise data fidelity. These insights contribute to refining experimental protocols and advancing our understanding of the complex dynamics underlying cardiovascular regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.