Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920436›Full record

ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

"

Janet M Boekhout, Rieteke Hut, Lilian Lechner, Denise A Peels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janet M BoekhoutDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Open University of The Netherlands, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-6060
Rieteke HutDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Open University of The Netherlands, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Lilian LechnerDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Open University of The Netherlands, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Denise A PeelsDepartment of Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Open University of The Netherlands, 6401 DL Heerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0165-4677

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 05460402110001 (ZonMw)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many middle-aged and older adults (MAOAs) do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA), despite its well-documented benefits for healthy aging. Existing PA interventions often fail to reach or engage the target population effectively. This study investigates MAOAs' preferences for recruitment strategies to optimize the reach and uptake of PA interventions, thereby enhancing their impact on healthy aging and public health. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 39 MAOA participants (69% female, mean age = 69.46, SD = 7.07), guided by McGuire's Theory on Persuasive Communication. Factors related to the source, message content, channel, receiver characteristics and target behavior of recruitment strategies were analyzed. Our findings suggest a preference for trustworthy sources (e.g., healthcare professionals over commercial entities) and positive, non-ageist messaging. MAOAs vary in their channel preferences but emphasize the importance of personalization. Despite heterogeneity, MAOAs commonly perceive themselves as sufficiently active, indicating a need for improved knowledge on what constitutes sufficient PA, as well as easy enrollment or trying out interventions. Tailoring recruitment strategies to diverse MAOA segments based on age seems crucial for effective engagement. Future research could explore quantitative research into how communication factors relate to various target population characteristics.

Indexed as

healthy agingimplementationinterventionsmiddle agedolder adultsphysical activityrecruitment strategies

Identifiers

PMID38920436
PMCPMC11202473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.