Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38920071›Full record

ReviewMini reviews in medicinal chemistry2025

Revolutionizing Playing with Skeleton Atoms: Molecular Editing Surgery in Medicinal Chemistry.

Amgad M Rabie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Amgad M RabieHead of Drug Discovery & Clinical Research Department, Dikernis General Hospital (DGH), Magliss El-Madina Street, Dikernis City 35744, Dikernis, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-3681-114X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding the most perfect drug candidates in the fields of drug discovery and medicinal chemistry will remain the main interest of drug designers. This concern necessitates organic and medicinal chemists, in most examples, to precisely design and search for drug candidates that are very analogous to the present effective drugs with solving, mainly, their proven critical pharmacological and clinical issues through slightly changing one or two atoms of the principal functional skeletons of the molecules of these present therapeutics by atom swapping, removal, and/or addition procedures in organic chemical synthesis. This accurate modern chemicosimilarity tactic in drug discovery surely saves time while keeping us very close, or sometimes highly superior, to the parent pharmacophoric bioactivity (i.e., keeping considerable analogy to the parent therapeutic molecule). From this perspective and logic, the science of skeletal editing of molecules (i.e., skeletal molecular editing) arose in the era of artificial intelligence (AI) and its dramatic predictions. As a pioneer in this modern branch in pharmaceutical and therapeutic organic chemistry, in this up-to-date minireview and perspective article, an attempt was made to introduce skeletal editing and its synthetic surgeries (over molecules) to the audience (including irrelevant readers) in a simpler and more attractive way as a novel chemical technology, highlighting the previous synthetic trials (in general), demonstrating the three main techniques, and, finally, discussing the future therapeutic needs and scenarios from a medicinal chemist's viewpoint.

Indexed as

Chemistry, PharmaceuticalArtificial IntelligenceDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHumansartificial intelligence (AI)carbon/nitrogen/oxygen atom.chemical robotchemico-editing machinedrug discoveryheterocyclic compoundmedicinal chemistrymolecular drug designSkeletal editing (SKED) strategysynthetic organic chemistry

Identifiers

PMID38920071
PMCPMC11851142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.