SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2024
The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in postherpetic neuralgia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Structural Brain Connectivity in Postherpetic Neuralgia and its Association with Neuropathic Pain Severity: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: From Cortical Analgesia to Phenotype-Stratified Clinical Translation.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Novel Insights into the Management of Painful Trigeminal Neuropathy: Targeting Peripheral and Central Pathomechanisms.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). Methods: Through an extensive search in four databases until October 2023, we selected five randomized controlled trials adhering to our specific criteria, involving 257 patients in total. For continuous outcomes, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using Cochran's Results: Our analysis found that rTMS reduced the overall visual analogue scale (VAS) (SMD: -1.52, 95% CI: -2.81 to -0.23, Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might have a potential alleviating effect on PHN symptoms. However, due to the limited number of studies and variations in rTMS parameters, larger sample studies involving more diverse populations, as well as further clarification of the most appropriate stimulation protocol, are still needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier ID: CRD42023488420.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.