Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919964›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2024

Funding of evidence included within public comments submitted to inform Medicare national coverage determinations.

Angela Lu, Robin Z Ji, Marley P D Magee, Joseph S Ross, Reshma Ramachandran, Rita F Redberg, Sanket S Dhruva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela LuUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2128-1369
Robin Z JiUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Marley P D MageeUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4983-4545
Joseph S RossSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9218-3320
Reshma RamachandranSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-3606
Rita F RedbergDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Sanket S DhruvaUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-2032

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) relies on public comments submitted in response to proposed national coverage determinations to assist the agency in determining the coverage of items and services for Medicare beneficiaries. In a cross-sectional study, we characterized the cited evidence and what funding supported the cited evidence submitted in public comments to CMS for all therapeutic medical device national coverage determinations finalized between June 2019 and June 2022. Of 681 public comments, 159 (23%) cited at least 1 identifiable published scientific journal article. Within these 159 public comments, 198 unique articles were cited, 170 (86%) of which included funding statements or author disclosures. Among these, 96 (56%) disclosed funding from manufacturers that would benefit from Medicare coverage and/or were written by author(s) who received funding from these manufacturers. In summary, most public commenters for national coverage determinations did not cite published scientific journal articles to support their positions. Among those who did, more than half of articles were directly funded by manufacturers that would benefit from coverage. Greater funding of independent, non-industry-supported research may help provide unbiased evaluations of benefits and harms to support Medicare coverage decisions.

Indexed as

conflict of interestdisclosureMedicaretechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID38919964
PMCPMC11196998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.