Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919877›Full record

ArticleCartography and geographic information science2024

Dimensions of Uncertainty: A spatiotemporal review of five COVID-19 datasets.

Dylan Halpern, Qinyun Lin, Ryan Wang, Stephanie Yang, Steve Goldstein, Marynia Kolak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartography and geographic information science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dylan HalpernCenter for Spatial Data Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Qinyun LinCenter for Spatial Data Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ryan WangCenter for Spatial Data Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stephanie YangCenter for Spatial Data Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Steve GoldsteinDepartment of Botany, American Family Insurance Data Science Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Marynia KolakCenter for Spatial Data Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Survey CoreU2CDA050098 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI POLLACK, HAROLD ALEXANDER, SCHNEIDER, JOHN · 2019 to 2019
$17.2M
Methodology and Advanced Analytics Resource Center 2.0UM1DA050098 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Russell Brewer, HAROLD Alexander POLLACK · 2024 to 2026
$8.4M
NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050098NIDA NIH HHS UM1 DA050098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 surveillance across the U.S. is essential to tracking and mitigating the pandemic, but data representing cases and deaths may be impacted by attribute, spatial, and temporal uncertainties. COVID-19 case and death data are essential to understanding the pandemic and serve as key inputs for prediction models that inform policy-decisions; consistent information across datasets is critical to ensuring coherent findings. We implement an exploratory data analytic approach to characterize, synthesize, and visualize spatial-temporal dimensions of uncertainty across commonly used datasets for case and death metrics (Johns Hopkins University, the New York Times, USAFacts, and 1Point3Acres). We scrutinize data consistency to assess where and when disagreements occur, potentially indicating underlying uncertainty. We observe differences in cumulative case and death rates to highlight discrepancies and identify spatial patterns. Data are assessed using pairwise agreement (Cohen's kappa) and agreement across all datasets (Fleiss' kappa) to summarize changes over time. Findings suggest highest agreements between CDC, JHU, and NYT datasets. We find nine discrete type-components of information uncertainty for COVID-19 datasets reflecting various complex processes. Understanding processes and indicators of uncertainty in COVID-19 data reporting is especially relevant to public health professionals and policymakers to accurately understand and communicate information about the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data UncertaintyEpidemiologyHealth InformaticsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID38919877
PMCPMC11196018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.