Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919842›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Urethral multiplicity in boys: systematic review of case reports and case series from the last 15 years.

Horea Gozar, Zsolt Bara, Evelyn Kovacs, Iulia Gozar, Zoltan Derzsi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Y-duplication of the Urethra with an Unusual Morphology (Type AJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Horea GozarClinic of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Zsolt BaraClinic of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Evelyn KovacsDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Iulia GozarUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Zoltan DerzsiClinic of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics, County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Târgu Mureș, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Urethral multiplicity is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by the presence of two or more urethral channels. It is more common in males and can cause double urinary stream, incontinence, obstruction, and recurrent urinary infections. Diagnosis is difficult due to diverse clinical manifestations. Implementing an evidence-based treatment plan is challenging due to the need for more concise and informative summary publications. Our paper provides a comprehensive review of the management of this pathology and might serve as a valuable resource for pediatric urologists and specialists in the field. Methods: A comprehensive search in four electronic databases, PubMed®, PubMed Central® (PMC), Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics's Web of Science (WoS), was conducted to identify case reports and series published between 2008 and 2023 on urethral multiplicities. The quality of the articles was assessed using qualified instruments. Covidence® tool-guided synthesis was followed by individual patient data extraction. Further classifications and analysis were made using Microsoft Excel®. Results: Out of the 90 papers included in the review, 62 were case presentations, and 28 were case series. We found 250 boys with urethral multiplicity. Based on Effman's classification, there were 38 cases of type I (15.3%), 21 type IIA1 (8.4%), 55 type IIA2 (22.1%), 91 type IIA2Y (36.5%), 4 type IIB (1.6%), and 6 type III (2.4%) urethral duplications. There were 19 cases of prepubic sinuses (7.6%), 9 triplications (3.6%), and 6 unknown forms (2.4%). We have provided data for each type, including clinical presentation, investigations, surgical management, and outcomes. Conclusions: Urethral multiplicities are a rare and varied group of malformations that require high-quality imaging examination for successful management. Treatment is specific to each patient and may depend on the surgeon's preference or skill. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID = CRD42023471685, identifier (CRD42023471685).

Indexed as

prepubic sinusurethral duplicationsurethral multiplicityurethral triplicationvoiding

Identifiers

PMID38919842
PMCPMC11196844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.