ReviewFrontiers in health services2024
Towards evidence-based practice 2.0: leveraging artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Review in Frontiers in health services, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global research trends on artificial intelligence in psychological interventions for stroke survivors: a bibliometric and visualized analysis (2000-2024).Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- When is AI "just another innovation"? A comparative conceptual analysis of artificial intelligence and evidence-based practice implementation.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Translational human gut microbiome research: What are the missing pieces of the puzzle?Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Investigating the Implementation and Impact of AI-Assisted Fall Prevention in Hospitals: Protocol for a Multicenter, Multimethod Observational Study in Sweden (SAFE).JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Evidence Search and Synthesis.The American journal of nursing · 2026Article
- Radiology Staff Experiences With Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into Radiology Practice in a Swedish Hospital: Qualitative Case Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Application of artificial intelligence to measure and predict patient values and preferences: a scoping review.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Support Dietetic Practice Across Primary Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Transformative Impact of the Internet on the Boundaries for the Physician Profession: Why Materiality Matters.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- "I Believe That AI Will Recognize the Problem Before It Happens": Qualitative Study Exploring Young Adults' Perceptions of AI in Mental Health Care.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions for the Integration of Automation in Nursing Practice: Discursive Study.JMIR nursing · 2025Review
- Article
- Healthcare Professionals' perspectives on AI-driven decision support in young adult mental health: an analysis through the lens of a shared decision-making framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- A critical look into artificial intelligence and healthcare disparities.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Intuitive Medicine: A New Vision for Medical Education.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Enhancing fieldwork readiness in occupational therapy students with generative AI.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Psychological Counseling: A Narrative Review and Governance Framework.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) involves making clinical decisions based on three sources of information: evidence, clinical experience and patient preferences. Despite popularization of EBP, research has shown that there are many barriers to achieving the goals of the EBP model. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare has been proposed as a means to improve clinical decision-making. The aim of this paper was to pinpoint key challenges pertaining to the three pillars of EBP and to investigate the potential of AI in surmounting these challenges and contributing to a more evidence-based healthcare practice. We conducted a selective review of the literature on EBP and the integration of AI in healthcare to achieve this. Challenges with the three components of EBP: Clinical decision-making in line with the EBP model presents several challenges. The availability and existence of robust evidence sometimes pose limitations due to slow generation and dissemination processes, as well as the scarcity of high-quality evidence. Direct application of evidence is not always viable because studies often involve patient groups distinct from those encountered in routine healthcare. Clinicians need to rely on their clinical experience to interpret the relevance of evidence and contextualize it within the unique needs of their patients. Moreover, clinical decision-making might be influenced by cognitive and implicit biases. Achieving patient involvement and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients remains challenging in routine healthcare practice due to factors such as low levels of health literacy among patients and their reluctance to actively participate, barriers rooted in clinicians' attitudes, scepticism towards patient knowledge and ineffective communication strategies, busy healthcare environments and limited resources. AI assistance for the three components of EBP: AI presents a promising solution to address several challenges inherent in the research process, from conducting studies, generating evidence, synthesizing findings, and disseminating crucial information to clinicians to implementing these findings into routine practice. AI systems have a distinct advantage over human clinicians in processing specific types of data and information. The use of AI has shown great promise in areas such as image analysis. AI presents promising avenues to enhance patient engagement by saving time for clinicians and has the potential to increase patient autonomy although there is a lack of research on this issue. Conclusion: This review underscores AI's potential to augment evidence-based healthcare practices, potentially marking the emergence of EBP 2.0. However, there are also uncertainties regarding how AI will contribute to a more evidence-based healthcare. Hence, empirical research is essential to validate and substantiate various aspects of AI use in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.