Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919711›Full record

ArticleBiodesign research2024

Accelerating Genetic Sensor Development, Scale-up, and Deployment Using Synthetic Biology.

Shivang Hina-Nilesh Joshi, Christopher Jenkins, David Ulaeto, Thomas E Gorochowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodesign research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 'Intelligent' proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shivang Hina-Nilesh JoshiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.
Christopher JenkinsCBR Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK.
David UlaetoCBR Division, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK.
Thomas E GorochowskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1702-786X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living cells are exquisitely tuned to sense and respond to changes in their environment. Repurposing these systems to create engineered biosensors has seen growing interest in the field of synthetic biology and provides a foundation for many innovative applications spanning environmental monitoring to improved biobased production. In this review, we present a detailed overview of currently available biosensors and the methods that have supported their development, scale-up, and deployment. We focus on genetic sensors in living cells whose outputs affect gene expression. We find that emerging high-throughput experimental assays and evolutionary approaches combined with advanced bioinformatics and machine learning are establishing pipelines to produce genetic sensors for virtually any small molecule, protein, or nucleic acid. However, more complex sensing tasks based on classifying compositions of many stimuli and the reliable deployment of these systems into real-world settings remain challenges. We suggest that recent advances in our ability to precisely modify nonmodel organisms and the integration of proven control engineering principles (e.g., feedback) into the broader design of genetic sensing systems will be necessary to overcome these hurdles and realize the immense potential of the field.

Identifiers

PMID38919711
PMCPMC11197468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.