Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919677›Full record

ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2022

Nurses' perception of integrating an innovative clinical hypnosis-derived intervention into outpatient chemotherapy treatments.

Danny Hjeij, Karine Bilodeau, David Ogez, Marjorie Tremblay, Gilles Lavigne, Pierre Rainville, Caroline Arbour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danny HjeijUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Karine BilodeauUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
David OgezHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marjorie TremblayHôpital de la Cité-de-la-Santé, CISSS de Laval, Laval, Quebec, Canada.
Gilles LavigneUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Dentistry, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pierre RainvilleUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Dentistry, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Caroline ArbourUniversité de Montréal, Faculty of Nursing, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conversational hypnosis (CH) is known to optimize the management of symptoms resulting from antineoplastic treatment. However, the perception of nurses who have been called upon to integrate this practice into their care has yet to be documented. Goal: Describe how nurses perceive the integration of CH into chemotherapy-related care. Methods: Individual interviews and an iterative analysis were conducted with six nurses who had previous experience in CH in an outpatient oncology clinic. Findings: Six themes emerged: 1) the outpatient oncology clinic, a saturated care setting; 2) the key elements supporting the integration of CH into care; 3) an added value for patients; 4) a positive and rewarding experience for nurses; 5) collateral benefits; and 6) CH, an approach that warrants consideration amid the pandemic. Conclusion: These findings shed light on nurses' unique point of view regarding the challenges and benefits of integrating CH into oncology care.

Indexed as

cancerconversational hypnosisnursingoutpatient chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38919677
PMCPMC11195589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.