ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review.
Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prevalence and predictors of burnout among Chinese medical postgraduates: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesiology, as an occupation, has its own unique sets of challenges, problems, issues, and circumstances, all leading to "occupational stress," which by now should be unequivocally accepted as a well-established fact. It is futile to continue pursuing research questions like, if there "really" is stress existing among practicing anesthesiologists/trainees, by conducting questionnaire-based surveys and doing meta-analyses. A significantly high incidence of existence of occupational stress in anesthesiologists is an undisputable and practical reality, which, when longstanding, gets culminated into "burnout syndrome" with its disastrous outcomes. Rather than pursuing the often-trodden path of finding the incidence, sources, and other superficial issues, an in-depth study of available literary evidence in relation to burnout has been carried out. Objectifying it as a "syndrome," its etiopathogenesis, pathophysiology inclusive of the prevalent theories of its causality, typology, and progression into various stages of/continuum of the process as an evolving clinical entity have been described. The preventive measures and "coping strategies" have been discussed at length in the end. It is the fervent hope and the desire of the authors that this discourse will sensitize all anesthesiologists, especially the younger and upcoming future generation, and help them avoid becoming a prey to this dreadful entity!
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.