Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919431›Full record

ReviewJournal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

"Burnout syndrome" in anesthesiologists and remedial measures- A narrative review.

Mridul M Panditrao, Minnu M Panditrao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mridul M PanditraoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Minnu M PanditraoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research (AIMSR), Bathinda, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthesiology, as an occupation, has its own unique sets of challenges, problems, issues, and circumstances, all leading to "occupational stress," which by now should be unequivocally accepted as a well-established fact. It is futile to continue pursuing research questions like, if there "really" is stress existing among practicing anesthesiologists/trainees, by conducting questionnaire-based surveys and doing meta-analyses. A significantly high incidence of existence of occupational stress in anesthesiologists is an undisputable and practical reality, which, when longstanding, gets culminated into "burnout syndrome" with its disastrous outcomes. Rather than pursuing the often-trodden path of finding the incidence, sources, and other superficial issues, an in-depth study of available literary evidence in relation to burnout has been carried out. Objectifying it as a "syndrome," its etiopathogenesis, pathophysiology inclusive of the prevalent theories of its causality, typology, and progression into various stages of/continuum of the process as an evolving clinical entity have been described. The preventive measures and "coping strategies" have been discussed at length in the end. It is the fervent hope and the desire of the authors that this discourse will sensitize all anesthesiologists, especially the younger and upcoming future generation, and help them avoid becoming a prey to this dreadful entity!

Indexed as

Anesthesiologistsburnoutoccupational stress

Identifiers

PMID38919431
PMCPMC11196043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.