Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919344›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024

Research Toward Understanding the Benefits and Limitations of Orthotic Use To Improve Mobility and Balance for Individuals With Neuropathic Conditions.

Bopha Chrea, Donald D Anderson, Koren Roach, Jason Wilken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bopha ChreaDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Donald D AndersonDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Koren RoachDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Jason WilkenDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Walking is a vital activity often compromised in individuals with neuropathic conditions. Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease and Cerebral Palsy (CP) are two common neurodevelopmental disabilities affecting gait, predisposing to the risk of falls. With guiding scientific evidence limited, there is a critical need to better understand how surgical correction affects mobility, balance confidence, and gait compared to ankle foot orthosis (AFO) bracing. A systematic approach will enable rigorous collaborative research to advance clinical care. Methods: Key elements of this vision include 1) prospective studies in select patient cohorts to systematically compare conservative vs. surgical management, 2) objective laboratory-based evaluation of patient mobility, balance, and gait using reliable methods, and 3) use of patient-centric outcome measures related to health and mobility. Results: Valid and reliable standardized tests of physical mobility and balance confidence have been described in the literature. They include 1) the four-square step test, a widely used test of balance and agility that predicts fall risk, 2) the self-selected walking velocity, a measure of general mobility able to detect function change with orthosis use, and 3) the activity specific balance confidence scale, a survey instrument that assesses an individual's level of balance confidence during activity. Additionally, motion capture and ground reaction force data can be used to evaluate whole-body motion and loading, with discriminative biomechanical measures including toe clearance during the swing phase of gait, plantarflexion at 50% of swing, peak ankle plantarflexor moment, and peak ankle push-off power. Conclusion: The tools needed to support evidence-based practice and inform clinical decision making in these challenging patient populations are all available. Research must now be conducted to better understand the potential benefits and limitations of AFO use in the context of mobility and balance during gait for individuals with neuropathic conditions, particularly relative to those offered by surgical correction. Clinical Relevance: Following this path of research will provide comparative baseline data on mobility, balance confidence, and gait that can be used to inform an objective criterion-based approach to AFO prescription and the impact of surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceCerebral PalsyCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseFoot OrthosesGaitGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansOrthotic DevicesWalkingAFOcavovaruscerebral palsycharcot-marie-tooth

Identifiers

PMID38919344
PMCPMC11195889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.