Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919343›Full record

ArticleThe Iowa orthopaedic journal2024

A Cross-Sectional Study of Gender-Specific Influences of Orthopedic Subspecialty Selection.

Katelyn T Koschmeder, Amelia C Hurley-Novatny, Alex A Marti, Kathryn M Sharp, Shannon E Linderman, Alex R Coffman, Catherine R Olinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Iowa orthopaedic journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring gender disparities: a survey among orthopedic residents.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katelyn T KoschmederCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Amelia C Hurley-NovatnyCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Alex A MartiCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kathryn M SharpCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Shannon E LindermanCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Alex R CoffmanDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Catherine R OlingerDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM139776 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Gordon F Buchanan · 2021 to 2026
$6.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Per the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 6.5% of practicing orthopedic surgeons are female and a majority subspecialize in pediatrics, hand, and foot and ankle surgery. The study purpose is to evaluate influences of orthopedic subspecialty selection, specifically factors such as perceived strength, lifestyle, and mentorship influence on subspecialty decisions and to identify if gender plays a role in these perceptions. Methods: An IRB approved cross-sectional study was conducted via email distribution of a REDCap Results: The survey yielded 282 responses (182 females and 100 males). Overall, the distribution of residents (28%), fellows (6%), and attendings (66%) correlates well with the prevalence of each respective physician category in the field of orthopedic surgery. The study demonstrated no difference in subspecialty choice based on mentorship, work-life-balance, career advancement, subspecialty culture, salary potential, family planning, or schedule. However, a statistically significant difference exists regarding stereotypes, perceived strength required, and perception of discrimination from pursuing a specific orthopedic subspecialty. 27% of females and 10% of males reported discouragement from any subspecialty (p<0.05). Adult reconstructive and oncology were most frequently discouraged. Women reported not choosing a subspecialty because of perceived physical demands more often than men (p<0.001). Women reported an increased use of adaptive strategies in the operating room (p<0.001). Women were also more likely to report feeling discouraged from pursuing a subspecialty due to their gender (p<0.001). Both men and women reported mentorship as the most influential factor in subspecialty selection. Conclusion: Women and men reported different factors were important in their decision of subspecialty. Women were more likely to be discouraged from a subspecialty and experience discrimination based on their perceived strength compared to male peers. Residents, fellows, and attending surgeons valued mentorship as the most influential in their subspeciality choice. This study suggests intrinsic and extrinsic influences that may differentially affect male and female orthopedic surgeons when they choose a subspecialty.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceOrthopedicsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMentorsOrthopedic SurgeonsPhysicians, WomenSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesgenderinfluencesmentorshipphysical strengthsubspecialtysubspecialty selectionwomen in orthopedics

Identifiers

PMID38919343
PMCPMC11195877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.