Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919315›Full record

ReviewAnnals of vascular diseases2024

Diagnosis and Treatments of Limb Lymphedema: Review.

Shinya Kitayama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of vascular diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Shinya KitayamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphedema is caused by dysfunction of the lymphatic system. It is divided into primary edema with no apparent cause and secondary edema with an exogenous cause. The main symptoms are edema and heaviness, skin changes such as skin hardening, lymphocysts, lymphorrhoea, papillomas, and recurrent cellulitis. They are often irreversible and progressive, thus greatly reducing quality of life of the patients. Diagnosis is made by image examinations that can evaluate lymphatic flow and functions such as lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green fluorescence lymphangiography. Linear pattern and dermal backflow are the main findings. Conservative treatment consists of four components: compression therapy with elastic garments, exercise therapy, manual lymphatic drainage, and skin care, which is called complex physical therapy (CPT). Although CPT has become the gold standard of treatment, with evidence of efficacy reported in terms of volume reduction, maintenance, and prevention of cellulitis, it is a symptomatic treatment and does not improve impaired lymphatic flow. On the other hand, surgical treatment, such as lymphaticovenous anastomosis and vascularized lymph node transplantation, can create new lymphatic flow and improve lymphatic dysfunctions. Although these techniques are expected to be effective in volume reduction, cellulitis prevention, and improving quality of life, there is a need for more studies with a higher level of evidence in the future. In Japan, lymphedema is treated with a combination of conservative and surgical therapies, but lymphedema is intractable and few cases are completely cured. Therefore, how to improve the outcome of treatment is an important issue to be addressed in the future. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2023; 32: 141-146.).

Indexed as

diagnosislymphedematreatment

Identifiers

PMID38919315
PMCPMC11196164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.