Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919270›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Adherence to therapeutic gastroscopy guidelines for acute esophageal food bolus impaction: Impact on adverse outcomes and length of stay.

Fei Yang Pan, Tuan Anh Duong, Kimberley J Davis, Matthew Smale, Sahil Kapoor, Claudia Rogge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fei Yang PanGastroenterology Department, Wollongong Hospital Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Warrawong New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9909-6359
Tuan Anh DuongGastroenterology Department, Wollongong Hospital Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Warrawong New South Wales Australia.
Kimberley J DavisGraduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-7259
Matthew SmaleGastroenterology Department, Wollongong Hospital Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Warrawong New South Wales Australia.
Sahil KapoorGastroenterology Department, Wollongong Hospital Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Warrawong New South Wales Australia.
Claudia RoggeGastroenterology Department, Wollongong Hospital Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District Warrawong New South Wales Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), gastroscopy should be conducted within 6 h for complete obstruction and 24 h for incomplete obstruction due to food bolus impaction. This study explores whether adults with acute esophageal food bolus (FB) impaction experience adverse outcomes when their time to esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) deviates from the recommended guidelines. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on the records of 248 patients who presented at the study site between 2015 and 2022 with symptoms of FB impaction. Results: Two hundred and forty-eight patients underwent EGD for FB impaction. Grade 1 (erosion, ulceration), Grade 2 (tear), and Grade 3 (perforation) complications were present in 31.6%, 6.9%, and 0.8% of cases, respectively. Of the 134 (54.0%) patients with complete obstruction, 51 (38.1%) received EGD within the recommended 6 h. Of the 114 (46%) patients with incomplete obstructions, 93 (81.6%) received EGD within the recommended 24 h. There was no statistically significant correlation between length of stay (LOS) post-EGD and any of ingestion to presentation time, presentation to EGD time, or ingestion to EGD time. Age and complication level were greater predictors of longer LOS than presentation to EGD time. Patients who presented in hours were significantly more likely to receive EGD within the 6- and 24-h guidelines than those who presented out of hours (50.7% Conclusion: Neither time to EGD from ingestion of food bolus nor time to EGD from hospital presentation correlated with complication rate, complication severity, or length of stay post-EGD.

Indexed as

complicationseosinophilic esophagitisfood bolusfood impactionlength of staytherapeutic gastroscopy

Identifiers

PMID38919270
PMCPMC11197022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.