ArticleCureus2024
Current Practices and Challenges in the Management of Complex Renal Stones in Africa: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is "Open Stone Surgery with Intraoperative Nephroscopy" a Better Alternative to Percutaneous Stone Removal for Complex Kidney Stones in Resource-Constrained Rural Settings?: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- Extraplanar ultrasound-guided multi-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a retrospective comparative study in patients with complex nephrolithiasis.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Associations of metabolic syndrome and its components with complex renal calculi and stone composition: a cross-sectional study.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Survey on the disease spectrum of Chinese patients at the outpatient clinic of the 30th Chinese medical aid team in Guinea.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Is double-J stent mandatory in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for adult patients with staghorn renal stones?BMC urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reviews the challenges and management strategies for complex renal stones in Africa. Historically viewed as infection or struvite stones, recent studies highlight diverse compositions of staghorn stones. These complex stones pose significant risks, including recurrent urinary tract infections and renal impairment. In the past, conservative management of staghorn stones was associated with high morbidity; thus, surgical intervention was necessary for complete eradication. While percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard, it carries notable risks, leading to a shift towards minimally invasive techniques. This study reviews challenges and management practices for complex renal stones and staghorn calculi in African countries, evaluating stone-free rates and associated complications. A scoping review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, was performed. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, African Journal Online (AJOL) and Google Scholar, yielding 1,101 articles, but only 11 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The study included 1,513 patients with 1,582 renal units, predominantly male (67.2%) with an average age of 40.7 years. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was the primary treatment for the majority (71.3%), followed by open surgery (21.9%), laparoscopic surgery (4.1%), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) (2.7%). The stone clearance rates for PCNL, open surgery, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, and RIRS were 82.8%, 83.7%, 100%, and 92.8%, respectively. Stone sizes ranged between 22 and 80 mm, with 66% being staghorn stones. Complication rates were highest for open surgery (30.8%) and lowest for RIRS (4.7%). Despite PCNL being the global standard, African studies still indicate a high reliance on open surgery, likely due to healthcare infrastructure, resource availability and socioeconomic factors. Enhancing access to urological care and addressing healthcare disparities are imperative for improving staghorn stone management in Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.