Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919234›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Current Practices and Challenges in the Management of Complex Renal Stones in Africa: A Scoping Review.

Habeeb A Abdulrasheed, Althea O George, Petra S Ayobami-Ojo, Nwachukwu O Nwachukwu, Aisha T Ajimoti, Waleed Elsayed, Ayokunle Adenipekun, Muhammad Ali Khattak, Olanrewaju Amusat, Banan Osman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Habeeb A AbdulrasheedUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Althea O GeorgeSurgery/Urology, The Royal London Hospital, London, GBR.
Petra S Ayobami-OjoSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, GBR.
Nwachukwu O NwachukwuInternal Medicine, St. Nicholas Hospital, Lagos, NGA.
Aisha T AjimotiNursing, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, GBR.
Waleed ElsayedUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Ayokunle AdenipekunUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Muhammad Ali KhattakUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Olanrewaju AmusatUrology, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, Luton, GBR.
Banan OsmanUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviews the challenges and management strategies for complex renal stones in Africa. Historically viewed as infection or struvite stones, recent studies highlight diverse compositions of staghorn stones. These complex stones pose significant risks, including recurrent urinary tract infections and renal impairment. In the past, conservative management of staghorn stones was associated with high morbidity; thus, surgical intervention was necessary for complete eradication. While percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remains the standard, it carries notable risks, leading to a shift towards minimally invasive techniques. This study reviews challenges and management practices for complex renal stones and staghorn calculi in African countries, evaluating stone-free rates and associated complications. A scoping review of the literature, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, was performed. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, African Journal Online (AJOL) and Google Scholar, yielding 1,101 articles, but only 11 articles satisfied the inclusion criteria. The study included 1,513 patients with 1,582 renal units, predominantly male (67.2%) with an average age of 40.7 years. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was the primary treatment for the majority (71.3%), followed by open surgery (21.9%), laparoscopic surgery (4.1%), and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) (2.7%). The stone clearance rates for PCNL, open surgery, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, and RIRS were 82.8%, 83.7%, 100%, and 92.8%, respectively. Stone sizes ranged between 22 and 80 mm, with 66% being staghorn stones. Complication rates were highest for open surgery (30.8%) and lowest for RIRS (4.7%). Despite PCNL being the global standard, African studies still indicate a high reliance on open surgery, likely due to healthcare infrastructure, resource availability and socioeconomic factors. Enhancing access to urological care and addressing healthcare disparities are imperative for improving staghorn stone management in Africa.

Indexed as

africacomplex renal stoneskidneypercutaneous nephrolithotomy (pcnl)renal unitstaghorn calculi

Identifiers

PMID38919234
PMCPMC11199025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.