ArticleCureus2024
Treatment Delays for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Rural Arkansas Emergency Department: A Retrospective Chart Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating Thrombolysis Rates and Emergency Department Time Targets in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Need for Personalized Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The goal of this study is to evaluate treatment times regarding acute ischemic stroke and identify barriers to implementing stroke care at the Ouachita County Medical Center Emergency Department. Methods A retrospective review of medical records was conducted of patients who presented with acute ischemic stroke to the Ouachita County Medical Center Emergency Department between 2020 and 2023 and received intravenous (IV) r-tPA. The primary focus of this study was to analyze door-to-needle time with IV r-tPA. To determine areas of improvement, this study examined door-to-initial physician evaluation, door-to-CT, door-to-tele neurologist evaluation, and door-to-IV r-tPA administration. Results A total of 26 patients who received treatment with IV r-tPA for acute ischemic stroke were included in this study. Twenty-three patients (88%; n=26) received IV- r-tPA within the recommended 60-minute window with a mean treatment time of 44.5 minutes. The mean door-to-physician evaluation time for patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke was 1.81 minutes. All patients received CT scans within 28 minutes of arrival with the mean time being 5.08 minutes. Teleneurologist evaluation was initiated within 59 minutes of presentation with a mean time of 25.19 minutes. Conclusion Evaluation of treatment times at the Ouachita County Medical Center Emergency Department confirms that stroke care received at this facility adheres to the recommendations outlined by the American Stroke Association. Nevertheless, clinicians should always strive for improvement. Through extensive evaluation of the treatment process, we were able to provide recommendations to further decrease treatment times and improve overall clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.