Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38919229›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Adequacy of Antenatal Care at Ministry of Health Facilities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Ali M Alsolami, Abdulmajeed G Alamri, Ali H Khodari, Raghda K Tayeb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali M AlsolamiPublic Health Administration, Ministry of Health, Jeddah, SAU.
Abdulmajeed G AlamriJoint Program of Preventive Medicine Post Graduate Studies, Ministry of Health, Madina, SAU.
Ali H KhodariObstetrics and Gynaecology, King Abdulaziz Hospital and Oncology Center, Jeddah, SAU.
Raghda K TayebObstetrics and Gynaecology, King Abdulaziz Hospital and Oncology Center, Jeddah, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Most pregnancy-related complications and undesirable outcomes are preventable by effective interventions at a reasonable cost. These interventions are mainly deployed during the antenatal phase and are included under the umbrella of antenatal care (ANC). To our knowledge, no studies have been conducted to assess the adequacy of ANC in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to measure and quantify the adequacy of ANC provided by the Ministry of Health (MoH) facilities in Jeddah and to determine potential factors influencing ANC. Methodology In this cross-sectional study, we used the Adequacy of Perinatal Care Utilization index to measure the adequacy of ANC. Data were collected from September 2023 to March 2024 in two randomly selected MoH hospitals by interviewing mothers and collecting data from medical records. Results A total of 303 mothers participated in this study. Mothers' mean age was 31 years, and 50% of them had received higher school education. Prevalence of adequate ANC was 64.7%. There was a significant association between the adequacy of ANC and mothers' level of education (p < 0.001), time taken to reach the nearest primary care center (p < 0.001), number of total pregnancies (p < 0.034), and the total number prenatal visits (p < 0.001). Conclusions This is the first study to shed light on the prevalence of adequacy of ANC in Saudi Arabia and its associated factors. This study would pave the way to investigate the adequacy of ANC on a national level and will aid policymakers in developing and implementing effective ANC preventive measures, hence helping improve women's health and their babies.

Indexed as

antenatal careapncujeddahneonatal healthsaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID38919229
PMCPMC11198215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.