ReviewCureus2024
A Bibliometric Analysis of the 20 Most Cited Articles on Sacrococcygeal Chordomas.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to summarize sacrococcygeal chordoma literature through bibliometric analysis and to offer insights into key studies to guide clinical practices and future research. The Web of Science database was searched using the terms "sacral chordoma", "chordomas of the sacrum", "chordomas of the sacral spine", "chordomas of the sacrococcygeal region", "coccygeal chordoma", and "coccyx chordoma". Articles were analyzed for citation count, authorship, publication date, journal, research area tags, impact factor, and evidence level. The median number of citations was 75 (range: 53-306). The primary publication venue was the International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Most works, published between 1999 and 2019, featured a median journal impact factor of 3.8 (range: 2.1-7) and predominantly fell under the research area tag, radiation, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Of these articles, 19 provided clinical data with predominantly level III evidence, and one was a literature review. This review highlights the increasing volume of sacrococcygeal chordoma publications over the past two decades, indicating evolving treatment methods and interdisciplinary patient care. Advances in radiation, particularly intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy, are believed to be propelling research growth, and the lack of level I evidence underscores the need for more rigorous studies to refine treatment protocols for sacrococcygeal chordomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.