ArticleCureus2024
Double Negative Is Positive: Anomalous Aortic Origin of the Left Coronary Artery Saved by a Bicuspid Aortic Valve.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical aortic origin of coronary artery (AAOCA) is a rare heart condition that has been identified in only a few autopsy cases and in some patients who have undergone angiographic evaluation. AAOCA is known to be closely linked with aortic valve malformations, with the most common type being the bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). A 77-year-old male with a medical history of hypertension and diabetes presented with dyspnea and orthopnea for three days. During the eventual cardiac catheterization, it was noted that the left coronary artery had an anomalous origin from the right side, coursing between the aorta and pulmonary artery. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) also showed a type 2 BAV and a left main coronary artery arising lower at the level of the pulmonary trunk. The dyspnea in this patient was attributed to diastolic dysfunction, and surgical correction of the coronaries was not done. The patient was managed on an outpatient basis for heart failure. In this case, the patient had an anomalous origin of the left coronary artery and type 2 BAV, which posed significant cardiovascular complications. It is unclear if the presence of the concomitant type 2 BAV led to the origin of the anomalous left coronary artery being at a lower level through its effect on the developmental mechanics. This lower origin may have resulted in lower compressive forces on the coronary artery as the inter-arterial pressures would be lower closer to the heart and farther from the lungs. Our case report aims to highlight this complex presentation where the BAV likely provides a benefit in AAOCA cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.