ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2024
Outcomes of emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Procedure duration and early postoperative stroke after endovascular and hybrid aortic arch reconstruction for acute aortic syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In today's era, cardiac catheterization procedures are becoming increasingly safe, but they are still fraught with complications. We aimed to study the outcomes of patients who underwent emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who required emergency surgical management following a complication in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in our institute from July 2017 to July 2022 was done. Result: A total of 57 patients out of a total of 52,326 patients (0.1%) were included. The average age of presentation was 10.4 years. Congenital heart disease (CHD) constituted the majority of the cases (28/57-49.1%), coronary artery disease (CAD) constituted 19.3% (11/57), and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) constituted 8.8% (5/57) of the cases. Apart from this, 22.80% patients (13/57) were grouped together in the miscellaneous group. In total, 76.9% (10/13) of these patients had pericardial effusion and they developed a right ventricular (RV) rent following an attempted pigtail drainage. Also, one patient each had a RV rent following an attempted permanent pacemaker implantation for heart block and an endocardial biopsy respectively. One patient had a left bronchial rupture following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aorta (DTA) aneurysm. Thirty-day mortality was 7% (4/57), and the mean time of shifting the patients from the catheterization laboratory to the operating room was 8.3 h. Conclusion: Cardiac catheterization procedures have become increasingly safe, but complications can still occur, for which the cardiac surgeon should be briefed in a Heart Team meeting before taking up such cases. Even though these complications form a small percentage, the cardiologist should exercise some caution in attempting cases which could have a relatively easier surgical correction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.