ArticleIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2024
Impact of distension pressure on saphenous vein endothelial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Long saphenous vein grafts (LSVGs) are pivotal conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), yet concerns persist regarding early failure and long-term patency. Endothelial damage, a potent initiator of graft failure, necessitates exploration of factors contributing to endothelial injury during LSVG preparation. Methods: A prospective, single-center study was conducted, assessing the impact of unregulated distension pressure on LSVG endothelium during CABG. Histological and CD31 (cluster of differentiation 31) immunohistochemical analyses were performed on 21 paired vein samples, categorized into non-distended (group A) and distended (group B) groups. Pressure recordings were obtained using different syringe sizes during vein distension. Results: Histological examination revealed a significantly higher percentage of endothelial cell loss in distended veins (31.95% ± 31.31) compared to non-distended veins (11.67% ± 28.65) ( Conclusion: Unregulated distension pressure during LSVG preparation is associated with greater endothelial damage, as evidenced by histological and immunohistochemical analyses. The inverse relationship between syringe size and pressure underscores the importance of controlled distension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.