ArticleBMC nursing2024
Advancing arrhythmia education through the CDIO approach: a new paradigm in nursing student training.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of an MDT-CDIO integrated teaching model in orthopedic clinical education: a controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate diagnosis and effective management of arrhythmias are crucial, with nurses playing a key role in the early detection and treatment, significantly impacting patient outcomes. Improving education on arrhythmias among nurses, especially in critical care and perioperative settings, can enhance patient safety and the quality of care.
methodsA total of 116 trainee nurses were randomly divided into two groups: one utilizing the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) model and the other employing a traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) method, to undergo arrhythmia training. The studyassessed the effects of the two teaching methods and investigated the students' attitudes toward these educational practices, with all participants completing pre- and post-course tests.
resultsThe CDIO model significantly enhances nursing students' arrhythmia proficiency, yielding higher test scores and sustained improvement after 24-week compared to the traditional LBL method, alongside markedly better self-learning enthusiasm, understanding, satisfaction with the teaching approach and effectiveness, and interest in learning arrhythmia. The CDIO model in nursing arrhythmia courses boosts theoretical knowledge and application, showing potential in clinical skill enhancement.
conclusionsOur study introduces the CDIO model in nursing arrhythmia courses, with improvement in knowledge and skills, and promise for broader application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.