ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2024
Improving the Feasibility of Mitigating Phase Errors in 4DCT caused by a Random Reference Breathing Pattern in the Quasar Phantom and the Role of Slice Thickness.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to validate a method for minimizing phase errors by combining full-length lung 4DCT (f4DCT) scans with shorter tumor-restricted 4DCT (s4DCT) scans. It assessed the feasibility of integrating two scans one covering the entire phantom length and the other focused on the tumor area. The study also evaluated the impact of Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) volume and imaging dose for different slice thicknesses (2.5mm and 1.25mm) in both full-length and short target-restricted 4DCT scans.
methodsThe study utilized the Quasar Programmable Respiratory Motion Phantom, simulating tumor motion with a variable lung insert. The setup included a tumor replica and a six-dot IR reflector marker on the breathing platform. The objective was to analyze volume differences in fMIP_2.5mm compared to sMIP_1.25mm within their respective 4D_MIP CT series. This involved varying breathing periods (2.5s, 3.0s, 4.0s, and 5.0s) and longitudinal tumor sizes (6mm, 8mm, and 10mm). The study also assessed exposure time and expected CTDIvol of s4D_2.5mm and s4D_1.25mm for different breathing periods (5.0s to 2.0s) in the sinusoidal wave motion of the six-dot marker on the breathing platform.
resultsConducting two consecutive 4DCT scans is viable for patients with challenging breathing patterns or when the initial lung tumor scan is in close proximity to the tumor location, eliminating the need for an additional full-length 4DCT. The analysis involves assessing MIP volume, imaging dose (CTDIvol), and exposure time. Longitudinal tumor shifts for 6mm are [16.6-17.2] in fMIP_2.5mm and [16.8-17.5] in sMIP_1.25mm, for 8mm [17.2-18.3] in fMIP_2.5mm and [17.8-18.4] in sMIP_1.25mm, and for 10mm [19-19.9] in fMIP_2.5mm and [19.4-20] in sMIP_1.25mm (p≥ 0.005), respectively.
conclusionThe Quasar Programmable Respiratory Motion Phantom accurately replicated varied breathing patterns and tumor motions. Comprehensive analysis was facilitated through detailed manual segmentation of Internal Target Volumes and Internal Gross Target Volumes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.