ArticleNature medicine2024
Adaptive selection at G6PD and disparities in diabetes complications.
Article in Nature medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pan-UK Biobank genome-wide association analyses enhance discovery and resolution of ancestry-enriched effects.Nature genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Disentangling Sex Differences in Sulfonylurea Drug Response With Genome-Wide Association Studies in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- The shape of fitness functions and the distribution of mutational effect sizes jointly limit adaptation by regulatory mutations.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Article
- Evidence for G6PD variant classification from multiplexed functional assays.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Higher diabetes genetic load in proliferative diabetic retinopathy in South India: The South Indian GeNetics of DiAbeTic Retinopathy (SIGNATR) study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Insights into the genetic aetiology of diabetes in Africa.EBioMedicine · 2026Review
- Clinical trial landscape of diabetic retinopathy: global advancements and future directions.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Linking the plasma proteome to genetics in individuals from continental Africa provides insights into type 2 diabetes pathogenesis.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Genome sequencing of 35,024 predominantly African ancestry persons addresses gaps in genomics and healthcare.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Undiagnosed G6PD Deficiency in Black and Asian Individuals Is Prevalent and Contributes to Health Inequalities in Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Complications.Diabetes care · 2025Article
- Diabetic retinal disease.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Phenotypic and Genetic Diversity in Diabetes Across Populations.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Review
- Bench to all Bedsides in Genomics and Precision Medicine.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Expanding scope of genetic studies in the era of biobanks.Human molecular genetics · 2025Article
- Insights into the molecular underpinning of type 2 diabetes complications.Human molecular genetics · 2025Review
- Enhancing NADPH to restore redox homeostasis and lysosomal function in G6PD-deficient microglia.Heliyon · 2025Article
- A clinical algorithm to identify people with the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase p.Val68Met variant at risk for diabetes undertreatment.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Development of electronic health record based algorithms to identify individuals with diabetic retinopathy.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Unveiling the Predictive Model for Macrovascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: microRNAs Expression, Lipid Profile, and Oxidative Stress Markers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes complications occur at higher rates in individuals of African ancestry. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (G6PDdef), common in some African populations, confers malaria resistance, and reduces hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels by shortening erythrocyte lifespan. In a combined-ancestry genome-wide association study of diabetic retinopathy, we identified nine loci including a G6PDdef causal variant, rs1050828 -T (Val98Met), which was also associated with increased risk of other diabetes complications. The effect of rs1050828 -T on retinopathy was fully mediated by glucose levels. In the years preceding diabetes diagnosis and insulin prescription, glucose levels were significantly higher and HbA1c significantly lower in those with versus without G6PDdef. In the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, participants with G6PDdef had significantly higher hazards of incident retinopathy and neuropathy. At the same HbA1c levels, G6PDdef participants in both ACCORD and the Million Veteran Program had significantly increased risk of retinopathy. We estimate that 12% and 9% of diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy cases, respectively, in participants of African ancestry are due to this exposure. Across continentally defined ancestral populations, the differences in frequency of rs1050828 -T and other G6PDdef alleles contribute to disparities in diabetes complications. Diabetes management guided by glucose or potentially genotype-adjusted HbA1c levels could lead to more timely diagnoses and appropriate intensification of therapy, decreasing the risk of diabetes complications in patients with G6PDdef alleles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.