Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918609›Full record

ReviewNature immunology2024

The balance of STING signaling orchestrates immunity in cancer.

Klara Rasmussen Bollerup Lanng, Emil Leth Lauridsen, Martin Roelsgaard Jakobsen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Self-assembled supramolecular nanoparticles ofActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  5. γδ T cells in colorectal and liver cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interstitial lung disease and the STING pathway.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Klara Rasmussen Bollerup LanngDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Emil Leth LauridsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Martin Roelsgaard JakobsenDepartment of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. mrj@biomed.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-9201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, it has become clear that the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway is critical for a variety of immune responses. This endoplasmic reticulum-anchored adaptor protein has regulatory functions in host immunity across a spectrum of conditions, including infectious diseases, autoimmunity, neurobiology and cancer. In this Review, we outline the central importance of STING in immunological processes driven by expression of type I and III interferons, as well as inflammatory cytokines, and we look at therapeutic options for targeting STING. We also examine evidence that challenges the prevailing notion that STING activation is predominantly beneficial in combating cancer. Further exploration is imperative to discern whether STING activation in the tumor microenvironment confers true benefits or has detrimental effects. Research in this field is at a crossroads, as a clearer understanding of the nuanced functions of STING activation in cancer is required for the development of next-generation therapies.

Indexed as

Membrane ProteinsNeoplasmsSignal TransductionTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsHumansSTING ProteinMembrane ProteinsSTING1 protein, humanSTING Protein

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.